Skip to main content

Set My Heart to Five - Simon Stephenson ****

This is a very clever novel, which owes a lot to the classic Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes. In Flowers for Algernon, the main character is an adult with the mind of a young child, who takes part in experimental treatment that enables him to become a genius before the gradual decline of his faculties back to his original condition sets in. The central character enables us to see the realities of human life from an initially childlike but increasingly sophisticated viewpoint. Set My Heart to Five has a similar approach, where a bot (here meaning an android, rather than a robot) starts to discover feelings and move from a mechanical view of life to a human-like one, exposing as he does so many of the oddities of human existence.

The extra twist to Simon Stephenson's well-crafted work is that it also incorporates a lot from the world and theory of film. It seemed a little forced initially that Stephenson deals with a number of significant events in Jared's (the central character's) life in the format of a film script, but this is multiply relevant both because movies will be central to Jared discovering his feelings and also because Jared both writes a film script and lives through a story that is painstakingly constructed in the format of one of the script-writing guides making it a classic Hero's Journey. The blurb accompanying the book proudly proclaims it has been signed up as a 'major motion picture' - and it would almost be bizarre if it wasn't, because there's nothing filmmakers like more than films about film-making.

The way that Jared gradually develops feelings - even love - is elegantly handled, and the storyline has all the requisite twists and turns, including all the classic movie sequences you could imagine. The road trip section near the end becomes truly page-turning as our hero makes a last-ditch attempt for survival, with the reader always aware of the omens suggested by Jared's discovery of how a film should play out for maximum effect. I also loved the way that one of the big influences on his life was Blade Runner.

There were some irritations. The narration Stephenson gives to Jared grates, as he can barely produce a paragraph without an exclamation mark. And the science here is so far-fetched as to make this closer to fantasy than SF. This is a post apocalyptic world, where the apocalypse was everyone being locked out of the internet, causing, for example, every plane to drop out of the sky. (Why?) Elon Musk has destroyed the Moon by incinerating it, which suggests Stephenson doesn't really know what the Moon is (or what destroying it would do to the Earth). And bots are basically humans who have been genetically modified to have a 'biological computer' instead of a brain (though they also, for some reason, need hard drives) - totally missing the point that the only 'biological computer' of any sophistication likely to be possible is a brain. 

I think it's better to simply go with the flow and ignore the science (or lack of it). It's a strong story, there's delightful interlacing with the history and language of film, and while I think some have over-emphasised the insights to be gained into the human condition here, it certainly gives Stephenson an opportunity to observe the absurdity of humanity's behaviour when seen from an outside (cinematic) viewpoint. One of the most interesting novels of 2020.

Hardback:

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more