Skip to main content

Jodi Taylor - Four Way Interview

Jodi Taylor is the internationally bestselling author of the Chronicles of St Mary's series, the story of a bunch of disaster prone individuals who investigate major historical events in contemporary time. She is also the author of the Time Police series - a St Mary's spinoff and gateway into the world of an all-powerful, international organisation who are NOTHING like St Mary's. Except, when they are. Alongside these, Jodi is known for her gripping supernatural thrillers featuring Elizabeth Cage together with the enchanting Frogmorton Farm series - a fairy story for adults. Born in Bristol and now living in Gloucester (facts both cities vigorously deny), she spent many years with her head somewhere else, much to the dismay of family, teachers and employers, before finally deciding to put all that daydreaming to good use and write a novel. Nearly twenty books later, she still has no idea what she wants to do when she grows up. Her latest book is Hard Time.

Why time travel?

The story wasn’t supposed to be about time travel at all – it was supposed to be about history. I wanted to write about all my favourite historical events and it seemed to me the only practical way to do that was to invent some time-travelling historians who could actually visit them in person. Thus was born the Institute of Historical Research at St Mary’s Priory.

Initially, St Mary’s itself wasn’t supposed to be that important. It was the history that was supposed to be the star of the show and St Mary’s was simply the mechanism for getting the historians to whichever event they were supposed to be observing. But, in the way of characters everywhere, they developed and became a bigger and bigger part of the story.


Why this book?

Well, having invented a bunch of irresponsible, feckless, time-travelling disaster-magnets – or historians as they prefer to be known - I thought I could then go on to write about the hapless organisation tasked with keeping them and the time-line straight so I invented the Time Police. A bunch of humourless thugs who don’t give a rat’s a**e about history and whose policy is to shoot everyone within a five-mile radius, torch everything in sight and then arrest any survivors.

Hard Time is the second in the Time Police series. It was an interesting book to write, as I tried to explore some of the darker aspects of time-travel and the uses to which it could be put. I don’t want to give away what is laughingly known as the plot, but should time travel ever become possible it will certainly raise ethical issues concerning the exploitation of people and resources from the past.


What’s next?

I think that’s a bit of a hard question to answer. No one really knows where we’ll be in six months’ time, do we? Hopefully my lockdown waistline will be under control and I’ll have tamed my lockdown hair – although I’m not optimistic about either of those.

Bookwise – the traditional St Mary’s short story is out on Christmas Day – The Ordeal of the Haunted Room … dum … dum… dum … Followed by the next full-length St Mary’s story in April. Look out for Another Time Another Place. Followed by the third Time Police novel – Saving Time – in October, I think.

So – busy, busy.


What’s exciting me at the moment?

Books mostly. New books to read and new books to write. I have notes for new projects and new genres to explore. For instance, I have another supernatural thriller out next year, notes for an historical novel, a couple of Regency romances and the story of a family having the misfortune to labour under two family curses.  Ironically, it’s time that is my problem. There’s never enough of it to get everything done.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...