The First Killer Robots - Andrew May ***

Mention killer robots and inevitably thoughts go to something from science fiction like the Terminator - but Andrew May makes the point in this compact book that the real-life killer robots have been guided missiles. Starting with the V1 and V2 missiles used by the Germans during the Second World War, we come forward in time to see these destructive weapons become more and more sophisticated.

Whether we are talking surface to air missiles, cruise missiles or ICBMs, May gives us a guide to the development of this technology and how it has changed aspects of warfare. Guidance may have changed from vague point and time approaches to potential pinpoint precision, but missiles (and drones get a quick look-in too) are amongst the most advanced technology used in warfare and peacekeeping.

One of the most quoted put-downs in the history of science is Rutherford's alleged remark that all science is either physics or stamp collecting. A fair amount of this book fits into the stamp collecting category. I'm not knocking this, but it doesn't make for the most inspiring reading. However, the book really comes alive when May tells us a story, particularly of a real life situation where a guided missile has been used in error, resulting in particularly shocking outcomes.

I expected to read this book primarily for useful background information, and a lot of it is just that, but I was surprised by how gripping some of the stories of missile deployment were.

Paperback:

Kindle:

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life. To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

Search This Blog