Skip to main content

Stephen James O'Meara - Four Way Interview

Stephen James O’Meara is an award-winning astronomer and author/co-author of more than a dozen books, including the third edition of Oxford’s A Dictionary of Space Exploration (2018). He is a columnist and editor for Astronomy magazine, and former associate editor of GeminiFocus and Sky & Telescope magazines. Asteroid 3637 is named O’Meara in his honour. His latest book is Mars.

Why science?

Science is the key to understanding mysteries. I grew up during the golden age of science fiction and space exploration, when questions initially outweighed answers. 

What comes especially to mind from that era was the first episode of the 1963 TV programme, The Outer Limits, called The Galaxy Being. In it, a peaceful being from the Andromeda Galaxy is accidentally brought to Earth via radio transmission. The military tries to destroy the Being but fails. In response, the Galaxy Being simply tells the earthlings to stop using force, reminding them that there are powers in the Universe beyond anything they know. He then tells them, 'There is much you have to learn. You must explore. You must reach out. Go to your homes. Go and give thought to the mysteries of the Universe.' And that’s what I did, and have done ever since I saw that program at the age of six. The point is we fear what we don’t understand. We need science to alleviate those fears.

Why this book?

Mars has fascinated me since childhood when I began observing it with a 60-mm refractor from my back porch in the 1960s, followed by seeing the 1971 global dust storm at the age of 14 through the 9-inch Alvan Clark refractor at Harvard College Observatory — and  shown to me by the dust storm’s discoverer Dennis Milon. This global storm was the one that largely obscured the planet from the Mariner 9 spacecraft’s view when the craft achieved orbit around Mars on November 14th of that year, just two days before my 15th birthday. Admittedly, I was fascinated by the lore of the Red Planet — as presented by Lowell with his canals, and as depicted in science fiction (especially from the pages of Edgar Rice Burroughs). To me, Mars was a planet alive with mysteries. Little has changed in that respect. Did Mars have water in the past? Does Mars have water today? Did life (microbial) once exist on the Red Planet? Does life still exist on the Red Planet today?  What happened to Mars’s atmosphere? Is Mars habitable? Are humans capable of colonising Mars? No other planet has captured human imagination the way Mars has, and I believe this book is simply a tribute to the ongoing investigation of a planet that was once seen as a mirror of the Earth — and to the imagination of a child who dared to wonder about that world and who continues to do so today.

What’s next?

I’ve always been fascinated with the visible phenomena of the daytime and twilight skies — it’s a part of the visible Universe that largely goes unnoticed. Yet each day offers us the possibility of seeing visual phenomena that capture the ever-changing mood of Earth’s ocean of air and the way light plays with it, or the way the human eye perceives it: the green flash, prismatic ice crystal displays, volcanic twilights, atmospheric glories and so much more. All these phenomena bring us closer to understanding the planet on which we live.  

What’s exciting you at the moment?

You mean aside from from life, nature, and the visible universe? I suppose I’m really looking forward to the upcoming missions to Mars, which should continue to unravel the mysteries surrounding what could potentially be humanity’s next home.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more