Skip to main content

Mission to the Heart Stars (SF) - James Blish ***

It's interesting, going as I have from reading this 1965 science fiction novel to a modern one. The good news is the modern ones are better written and less sexist. The bad news is that the modern one is far too long (at least three times the length), weighs four times as much (it's bigger format too) and is, inevitably, book one of a series, where most 60s novels were standalone.

That last comparison is a little unfortunate as Mission to the Heart Stars is the second of James Blish's 'Heart Stars' novels - but still there were a lot more individual novels back then. It's only by going back to my old books that I can find a novel I can read in a couple of days, and that's something that can be very satisfying. I blame Dune and the successors in Herbert's series for giving us the doorstop SF book. I loved Dune back in the day (though I find it a bit heavy-handed now), but it still has a lot to answer for.

One advantage of the short SF novel is that the author could use it to explore a specific topic - and that's what Blish does in a tradition that goes back to the likes of Erewhon and Gulliver's Travels. (In fact, Blish actually references Butler's book), by exploring the implications of different ways for civilisations to exist. The future Earth describes itself as 'post-civilisation' which is an interesting choice of terminology. It is contrasted with both that of the dolphins (now recognised as sentient) and various alien worlds briefly visited on the journey to the titular Heart Stars near the centre of the galaxy.

Blish's 'post-civilisation' is a reflection of how the Earth might end up if, as was forecast by some observers back in the 60s, we would end up with energy too cheap to meter. This is a world of abundance where no one need work - but to keep the place stable, only those who do work can vote or breed. The suggestion is that although this approach has its totalitarian aspects, it's the only way to have a stable society in a world without energy limits. Whether or not you agree with Blish, it's an analysis that makes the reader think - although dressed up as a neo-classical expedition story (the ship is called the Argo), the book is really a vehicle for ideas.

There are two aspects here that put this novel firmly in period. One is its gender imbalance. There is only one female character, a reporter - but the three central characters are all male. The other is a collection of flops in the imagination of future technology. Blish is often the exemplar of this in one of his early books, where he states you couldn't have electronics in Jupiter's atmosphere as the pressure would cause the vacuum tubes to implode. Here we have solid state electronics, 3D TV and lasers and computers. But the slide rule still exists, computers output their results on paper tape and photography requires a darkroom. It's interesting to ponder what the modern equivalents would be (though I still don't understand why the idea of a pocket computer/calculator didn't occur to SF writers sooner - they just loved their slide rules).

All in all, then, not a great novel, but an interesting one both for its ideas and as a peek into mid-60s thinking. One last thing you wouldn't see today - Blish ends a useful foreword, where he berates Aldous Huxley for apparently being unaware of most science fiction written since the 1920s, with what appears to be his home address, a rather pleasant looking New York apartment block.

Out of print in paperback (secondhand available) - but available in Kindle thanks to Gollancz's excellent Gateway series. The cover shown is of my 1965 edition.

Paperback:  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more