Skip to main content

The Autobiography: Patrick Moore ****

A whole generation of astronomy enthusiasts in the UK (me included) were engaged in the subject by Patrick Moore's TV show The Sky at Night. In this 2005 autobiography, Moore concentrates on his career from writing his first book in 1953, skipping over his youth and experiences as a pilot in the Second World War in a handful of pages. It is often fascinating stuff.

A starting point that is remarkable is that Moore had no scientific qualifications. (This comes across particularly in his dislike of the metric system.) He missed university due to the war and decided not to take up a place after. Astronomy is arguably the science where more contributions have been made by amateurs than any other, but few amateurs have enjoyed the respect of professionals felt for Moore. His speciality was the Moon in observing terms, but inevitably his most important contribution was in popularising astronomy.

A lot of the book is dedicated to the various topics covered by his TV show, but I hadn't remembered just how much he was also the BBC's go to for NASA missions, particularly the Apollo programme and exploratory probes like Voyager. His account of his work runs from the serious to an entertaining account of everything that went wrong when astronomy's international body the IAU put on its conference in Argentina.

There is no doubt that some of Moore's views on life in general are old fashioned to the point of being offensive - but they are not untypical of someone who grew up in the 1930s. There was also inevitably speculation about his being a lifetime bachelor: personally I accept his statement that he lost the love of his life, Laura, in the war and there could never be anyone else. However, there's no doubt he was a 'man's man' - probably helped by the male domination of astronomy and space exploration in his era. It's notable that in a chapter describing famous people he met they are almost all male.

What the reader encounters are the thoughts of a true eccentric - the sort of person that the BBC would now run a mile rather than employ (not just because, as Moore would no doubt point out if he were around now, because he was white, straight, old and male). As we have seen, some of Moore's views would now be unacceptable (he was aware of this in 2003, quite often remarking on his political incorrectness). But then, he was also passionate about ending fox hunting. This isn't a beautifully crafted, arty autobiography, but rather a rambling memoir of an unusual life. One of the things that definitely comes across is Moore's kindness - something I experienced in a small personal way.

When I wrote my first book, Light Years, I wrote to Moore asking for a comment to go on the cover. He gave me one - but perhaps more impressively before doing so he sent me three other letters, apologising for taking so long to respond. These were all typed on the 1908 typewriter he used to write all his books. (He notes in the autobiography that he couldn't buy compatible ink ribbons for it, so had to wind a newer ribbon by hand onto an old reel.) When you consider how much correspondence he would have got, this was truly remarkable.

Here's just one of those letters:

To some, Moore was a figure of fun - an overweight man wearing a monocle, oddly dressed and with a habit of playing the xylophone on TV with huge enthusiasm. But for many astronomers of a certain age he will remain a central figure in their personal development, and this book gives some insight into the man himself. 

Sadly the paper version is out of print, though can be obtained second-hand, and the ebook remains available.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...