Skip to main content

The Quantum Curators (SF) - Eva St. John ***

Having been captivated by Eva St. John's excellent fantasy Flint in the Bones and its sequel, I looked for anything else by St. John and came across her Quantum Curators series. I initially assumed these were five separate books, starting with The Quantum Curators and the Fabergé Egg, but it would be more accurate to describe it as a single five-volume novel.

For me, this turned out to be St. John on training wheels before she hit full capability with Flint in the Bones. Unlike that book, this is science fiction - specifically a many worlds multiverse story, though (initially) there are only two worlds, known by the occupants of one as Alpha and Beta Earths. Ours is Beta, while the other has more advanced technology and has developed a 'quantum stepper' that allows curators to cross into Beta Earth and rescue artefacts that would otherwise be destroyed or lost.

The main characters are Neith, an Alpha Earth curator from Egypt (it was a failure to destroy the Library at Alexandria and the loss of Julius Caesar that resulted in the split in their timeline) and Julius, an academic from Beta Earth who accidentally gets dragged into a mission that goes wrong. There are also (rather too many) secondary characters who feature regularly. 

There is a lot to like about the books. When the writing is on form there is plenty of action and some clever ideas arising from the nature of the technology and what is and isn't possible. This is why I got as far as book 3. But, for me, that writing is too inconsistent. The first book takes way too long to get going, and all of the books I read had significant chunks that added nothing and held things back. Also, compared with Flint in the Bones there is less development of the characters who, with the exception of Julius are distinctly two dimensional.

Assuming we allow the usual science fiction permit to have something impossible in the quantum stepper, I was also a little doubtful of a couple of key points in the distinction between Alpha and Beta Earths. Although the Library at Alexandria was certainly damaged by fire thanks to Caesar, it continued to exist and it seems unlikely that other empires would not have an impact if the Roman Empire never properly took off. Also the books attribute a huge amount of scientific genius to Leonardo da Vinci - there is no evidence that Leonardo had any great scientific ability and certainly would have been unable to develop quantum theory in the fifteenth century (though to be fair this is partially explained in book 3).

When the books are working well, they are great - but they just don't have the consistency of the later novel. They certainly are enjoyable, but I'm not a fan of very long books, and as soon as it was clear that the Fabergé Egg volume ended with what is effectively a 'to be continued' it turned me off.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Note Paperback is first volume but Kindle is box set. Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more