Skip to main content

Caleb Scharf - Five Way Interview

Caleb Scharf received the 2022 Carl Sagan Medal while director of astrobiology at Columbia University and is currently the senior scientist for astrobiology at NASA’s Ames Research Center. He has written several previous books and is a frequent contributor to Scientific American and Nautilus magazine. He divides his time between Silicon Valley and New York City. His new book is The Giant Leap: Why Space is the Next Frontier in the Evolution of Life.

Why science?

I still feel the sense of great wonder at the world that I did as a child. For me science isn’t about some harsh, clinical deconstruction of things, it’s a type of contemplative discipline that amplifies that wonder and helps create a better sense of connection to this vast, crazy, messy universe we’re part of. I also love toying with ideas and asking questions, and I’m in awe of all the ways we humans continue to invent to help answer those questions. 

Why this book?

I said to my agent that I wanted to write a book to 'nerd out' about space exploration and tell many of the stories that get less attention: about early attempts, robotic missions, technology, and the science revolutions of planets and moons and asteroids. She told me I needed to do more than that if anyone was ever going to read it! 

I realized that there’s a special perspective on space exploration that comes from examining the 'big picture' for life, like us, that learns to break free of its point of origin. That examination became the core of the book, using all the other stories as evidence. I wanted to show the connections between breakthroughs in human thought and space exploration, as well as the parallels and lessons from enterprises like Darwin’s voyage on the Beagle and his eventual formulation of a theory of biological evolution. That theory also turned around and changed the course of evolution on Earth, and I think space exploration is doing something similar right now.

Technology is clearly part of our evolutionary development, but is it possible that AI rather than space is the next frontier in the evolution of life?

I think it could be both things, a melding of extraordinary developments. Space exploration is already highly dependent on robotics and computing but will be even more dependent in the future as we spread ever more across the solar system and attempt more remote and ambitious types of exploration. AI is likely central to that and, in turn, space may drive new kinds of AI. We’re seeing this with talk of AI data centres in space, and large-model AI is starting to play a role in accelerating the development and operation of space missions. I think AI could be key to allowing life on Earth to overcome its biological limitations in space by becoming our space-worthy avatars for many things.

What’s next?

The physicist Niels Bohr said that prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future! But I think we’re going to see more robust activity in space that is about building an extended space economy. That already exists in terms of data, from GPS to satellite imaging, but next will be a shift towards activities that have interdependencies similar to how Earth’s economies do. Resources in solar power and compounds like lunar water are connected. Computing in space and the needs of other space activities are connected. I hope also this creates opportunities for science, making it far easier to explore or build telescopes to look out into the cosmos.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’m very keen to see what we can do with certain types of AI and machine learning to advance science. I know it’s almost a cliché at this point, and there is a lot of confusion out there, but algorithms like the very large AI models already being used for many tasks are remarkably good at learning the structures or features in data that elude humans. We’re beginning to see the possibilities for mathematical research, physics, and challenges like protein structure predictions. My day job is astrobiology, searching for life in the universe, and I think AI could enhance our ability to sense and decode the many, many dimensions of life’s properties in the world, from molecular behavior to energy use, and evolution. Can we build the right kind of AI and let it go look for life on Mars or elsewhere?

Photo © Nerissa Enscanlar

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more