Into Everywhere (SF) - Paul McAuley ***

This sequel to Paul McAuley's excellent Something Coming Through holds a lot of promise. Like its predecessor it is set in a near future where we are travelling to multiple worlds through gateways after first contact with two alien species. On these frontier planets, humans uncover alien artefacts from now disappeared races - some result in great medical and scientific breakthroughs... others modify the brains of those who activate them, mostly in a negative fashion.

Another similarity with the first book is the alternation of two initially very different timelines which come together as you get through the story, in this case linked particularly by an individual who appears initially in very different ways. One thread, which I enjoyed more, features Lisa, a former tomb raider seeking alien artefacts who has become a loner living with her enhanced dog before her ex-husband drags her into a complex situation. The other features a rather Dune-like noble house, where a young man's attempts to rebel against family strictures becomes a fight for survival as dark forces attack.

So far, so good - and I very much enjoyed it to begin with. But by the time I got half way through I was beginning to feel that I had been reading it for months. The action is drawn out and seems to take ages to get anywhere. It simply lacked the narrative drive of the first book. The ideas are still great though.

Things do pick up past the mid-way point and I enjoyed it again at the end, where I found the first book hard to put down, this one I had to force myself to come back to. If you read and enjoy Something Coming Through, it's well worth getting Into Everywhere as well - but it didn't live up to my (very high) expectations.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Math for English Majors - Ben Orlin *****

Ben Orlin makes the interesting observation that the majority of people give up on understanding maths at some point, from fractions or algebra all the way through to tensors. At that stage they either give up entirely or operate the maths mechanically without understanding what they are doing. In this light-hearted take, Orlin does a great job of taking on mathematical processes a step at a time, in part making parallels with the structure of language. Many popular maths books shy away from the actual mathematical representations, going instead for verbal approximations. Orlin doesn't do this, but makes use of those linguistic similes and different ways of looking at the processes involved to help understanding. He also includes self-admittedly awful (but entertaining) drawings and stories from his experience as a long-time maths teacher. To make those parallels, Orlin refers to numbers as nouns, operations as verbs (though he points out that there are some flaws in this simile) a

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

2040 (SF) - Pedro Domingos ****

This is in many ways an excellent SF satire - Pedro Domingos never forgets that part of his job as a fiction writer is to keep the reader engaged with the plot, and it's a fascinating one. There is one fly in the ointment in the form of a step into heavy-handed humour that takes away its believability - satire should push the boundaries but not become totally ludicrous. But because the rest of it is so good, I can forgive it. The setting is the 2040 US presidential election, where one of the candidates is an AI-powered robot. The AI is the important bit - the robot is just there to give it a more human presence. This is a timely idea in its own right, but it gives Domingos an opportunity not just to include some of the limits and possibilities of generative AI, but also to take a poke at the nature of Silicon Valley startups, and of IT mega-companies and their worryingly powerful (and potentially deranged) leaders. Domingos knows his stuff on AI as a professor of computer science w

Search This Blog