Skip to main content

Lake of Darkness (SF) - Adam Roberts *****

Two of the best ever fantasy writers - Alan Garner and Gene Wolfe - both wrote books that over the years got more sophisticated and harder to take in, yet these books really rewarded the reader who put in the effort to a great degree. Adam Roberts has become their equivalent in the science fiction world. Although much of Lake of Darkness is an easy enough read, the concepts it is built on are mind-boggling and the last part left my mind buzzing, if not entirely sure what I had just experienced.

This could be seen as one of Roberts' few ventures into space opera - it certainly has the large scale trappings of this sub-genre. But the setting here is very different. Fairly early on, one of the characters (who it is does not become clear until later) addresses the reader directly, poking fun at the way that science fiction stereotypically sees space-based societies almost inevitably as militaristic, with ships modelled on warships. This is a very different type of future, with a society reminiscent in a way of Wells' Eloi in The Time Machine - who have just discovered their own version of Morlocks within.

In Roberts' future - several centuries from now - there is no work: most day-to-day essentials are handled by AIs. (This, in passing, gives an opportunity to underline what happens if you rely too much on AIs and they go wrong.) To keep themselves occupied, humans develop 'fandoms', based on anything from history to physics. It was somewhat scary to hear on the radio while reading this someone saying that to appeal to younger voters 'politicians should develop their own fandoms', though I think this was inspired more by Taylor Swift than Roberts.

For me, three major themes came through. One was a Swiftian take on this quasi-utopian future with its fandoms and obsession with caring for others feelings (as long as they didn't stray too far from the line) - in parts it felt a bit like Gulliver's Travels among the snowflakes. Humour is stressed here with the one bit of the book I found a touch irritating - every historical reference gets something wrong, misnaming books and characters with abandon (though I did enjoy the revived ancient popular song 'We all live in a yellow sunny scene').

A second theme was this being one of the few SF novels I've read that really relished and made use of the super-speculative science (or, rather, the ascientific speculation, given it's rarely based on observation) that is dedicated to black holes. Not only is this discussed at length, it is central to the working of the book. I'm not a fan of this as a scientific topic, but as a vehicle for science fiction it's brilliant.

The third theme is one that some SF fans will struggle with, though again I'd say Roberts handles it brilliantly - Christianity is central to the plot. Roberts is not the first to do this in a science fiction setting - think, for example, of Blish's A Case of Conscience or Miller's A Canticle for Leibowicz (not strictly Christianity but strongly based on its forms). This is not done by Roberts in a negative way as might have been typical of a new wave SF author, but simply takes as fact Christian beliefs, including the existence of devils as fallen angels, and explores some consequences.

I know this is a book I'm going to have to read again quite soon - and as is often the case particularly with Wolfe, I did find the ending too loose and open to interpretation to be truly satisfying, but even though the approach will strongly divide readers, for me this is without doubt one of the most impressive pieces of science fiction writing I've ever seen and possibly Roberts' best.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more