Skip to main content

Accidental - Tim James ***

Tim James' writing style is a bit like going to see a comedian who only tells one-liners. Initially it's amazing and highly entertaining, but eventually it can get a touch wearing. Having said that, thanks to the sheer variety of the content, James manages to keep the reader interested, and the short entries (not one liners, but mostly two to three pages), which feel as if they are coming at you at breakneck speed, make it decidedly moreish.

James is writing about unintentional scientific breakthroughs, which he divides into clumsiness; misfortunes - where things went wrong for the desired outcome, but then achieved something different (a fair number of these are medical); surprises, where results are unexpected; and eurekas, where a major breakthrough is caused by an apparently insignificant observation or comment.

The topics are wide ranging - everything from guncotton to the telephone, Super Soakers (oddly in the 'major breakthrough' Eureka section) to superglue. It's not all inventions, either (though somehow these feel the most appealing) - there are longer pieces, for example, on electromagnetic waves, from Newton's rainbow to gamma rays, and on the Belyayev silver fox experiment with its significance for views on adaption and genetics. And the icing on the cake is that most of the pieces include entertaining stories that bring the accidental discovery alive.

I did genuinely enjoy reading this book, but it has two flaws, the bigger of which pulled it down from 4 to 3 stars for me. The smaller one is that in his mad rush, James can give insufficient detail. For example, he tells of a student called George Dantzig who arrived late at a maths lecture, copied down what he thought was the homework from the blackboard and duly solved the problem, only to discover that it was 'one of the most difficult unsolved mathematical problems in history'. Only we're never told anything about the problem itself. In reality there were two problems, both in statistics, neither of which were key unsolved mathematical problems - and it would have been nice to have had a little detail. (James doesn't mention the obvious inspiration here for Good Will Hunting either.)

The bigger issue is that there's quite a lot that is inaccurate (to be fair to James, the exaggeration mentioned above came from Dantzig's obituary, but there are better sources). A couple of examples. In the story of penicillin - an essential for a book like this - we are told that Fleming made use of Penicillium rubrum, while a few years later a better alternative was discover in the US: 'the bacteria Penicillium rubrum'. Leaving aside the obvious fact that a bacterium is not a mould, neither mould was actually Penicillium rubrum (admittedly Fleming's was initially mistaken for this) - and they obviously weren't the same species or there wouldn't be much point

Later on we learn about the Eadweard Muybridge's development of moving pictures - this story is littered with errors. James connects everything from Muybridge changing his name (originally Edward Muggeridge) to his development of moving pictures to a disastrous accident where he suffered a head injury. In fact, Muybridge started changing his name long before the accident and his ideas were not based on 'time slowing down in the accident' but a combination of existing toys like the zoetrope, and his blossoming career as a photographer. He was also not acquitted on a murder charge, as James says, on the grounds of brain damage - this approach was tried and failed. His defence lawyer changed tack, and Muybridge was acquitted because his actions were considered the correct response to adultery by a jury. Finally we are told that moving pictures work by persistence of vision, a Victorian explanation that has long proved incorrect. (Perhaps James should have read this book.)

These and other errors are unfortunate, because this is a genuinely fun book that keeps up the interest in its frantic pace. If you can live with not everything being exactly accurate, though, it's well worth the read.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The New Lunar Society - David Mindell *****

David Mindell's take on learning lessons for the present from the eighteenth century Lunar Society could easily have been a dull academic tome, but instead it was a delight to read. Mindell splits the book into a series of short essay-like chapters which includes details of the characters involved in and impact of the Lunar Society, which effectively kick-started the Industrial Revolution, interwoven with an analysis of the decline of industry in modern twentieth and twenty-first century America, plus the potential for taking a Lunar Society approach to revitalise industry for the future. We see how a group of men (they were all men back then) based in the English Midlands (though with a strong Scottish contingent) brought together science, engineering and artisan skills in a way that made the Industrial Revolution and its (eventual) impact on improving the lot of the masses possible. Interlaced with this, Mindell shows us how 'industrial' has become something of a dirty wo...

Free Agents - Kevin Mitchell ****

Free will is one of those subjects that you have to be brave to take on: Kevin Mitchell makes an impressive job of defending a concept that some feel is incompatible with science. We start by taking a look at the common reasoning against free will - that because everything that happens is deterministically based on the interactions of particles (fields if you prefer), then there is no actual ability to 'choose' - everything simply follows on from its previous state in a mechanical fashion. Admittedly when we then add in quantum physics, there is an element of randomness introduced, but that does not appear to provide any room for agents to select what will happen next. So far, so common a view. But Mitchell argues that this is too limited an approach. While there are indubitably structural limitations on our ability to act with agency, whether down to nature or nurture, he still suggests that we (and other organisms) have the opportunity to make choices, in part due to being ca...

The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire - Henry Gee ****

In his last book, Henry Gee impressed with his A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth - this time he zooms in on one very specific aspect of life on Earth - humans - and gives us not just a history, but a prediction of the future - our extinction. The book starts with an entertaining prologue, to an extent bemoaning our obsession with dinosaurs, a story that leads, inexorably towards extinction. This is a fate, Gee points out, that will occur for every species, including our own. We then cover three potential stages of the rise and fall of humanity (the book's title is purposely modelled on Gibbon) - Rise, Fall and Escape. Gee's speciality is palaeontology and in the first section he takes us back to explore as much as we can know from the extremely patchy fossil record of the origins of the human family, the genus Homo and the eventual dominance of Homo sapiens , pushing out any remaining members of other closely related species. As we move onto the Fall section, Gee gives ...