Skip to main content

The Caves of Steel (SF) - Isaac Asimov ****

Recently reading In the Blink of an Eye, which features an AI detective, I realised it was time to revisit The Caves of Steel - and I'm glad I did. Despite being 70 years old in 2024, the book is still very readable. The setting is perhaps 3000 years in the future, with the population of Earth largely confined to huge enclosed cities, living a communal life that has been forced on them by resource limitations.

Although robots have been around for thousands of years, they are not widely accepted on Earth, though they are on various other-world colonies. The plot centres on a murder in an enclave outside the city of New York set up for 'spacers' who live a far freer life than the Earth population. A New York detective is partnered with a lifelike spacer robot to try to solve the crime. The detective story itself works well, but two things make the novel particularly interesting: the first is the interaction between detective Elijah Baley and the robot detective R. Daneel Olivaw. The second is how drastically wrong Asimov got the technology.

The Baley/Olivaw relationship - and the wider distrust of robots amongst the Earth population - is of particular interest now that AI is rearing its head as a practical replacement for an increasing number of jobs. While I doubt we would get to the same level of animosity - because robots are more in-your-face than ChatGPT - it's still a thought-provoking comparison.

As for the technology, I know perfectly well that science fiction is not intended to predict the future. But it is still fascinating to see how Asimov, from a 50s perspective, thought that humanoid robots would be fairly easy to build (in I Robot, he has humanoid robots on sale by the end of the twentieth century) but totally failed to see the possibilities of the information revolution. In Caves of Steel, computer memory still involves mercury chambers (something that in reality lasted a handful of years, rather than thousands), film and wire recording are still used, and there is no equivalent of the internet. Where the AI detective in the modern novel can search online data at ultra-high speed, Olivaw has no better search ability than a human, working through documents and microfilm.

As usual with Asimov (something he admitted himself), the biggest flaw here is his inability to write effective female characters. There is only one woman in the book and she is straight from the 50s housewife playbook. But this is the only real let-down here, as the technology misses are more delightful than irritating. Some people even still smoke pipes.

I got this as part of a six-book package of Asimov's robot books - I had all of these once, but they got culled in a move. It was excellent to revisit this title (which I read out of order because of In the Blink of an Eye) and I'm looking forward to the rest.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  

Six book package:   


Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more