Skip to main content

Kepler 438-B: Volume 1 (SF) - The Kepler Files ***

This is a very beautiful book, though it's in an odd format that's more like a TV screen in aspect ratio. The topic is a future mission to an exoplanet, the Kepler 438-B of the title. This is a little larger than Earth, orbiting very close to its dim star. It has been proposed as a possible habitable planet, but some suggest that the level of radiation from the star would be too high for life.

Rather than present us with a conventional narrative, what we have here is a series of pages dominated by images, along with a whole range of different types of text, from interview quotes to log entries. Many of the images are stunning, AI generated with lots of detail. It's a very visual design from the Kepler Files team who, from the biographies are highly design-oriented.

The book was without doubt fun to flick through, but there is one big issue with it. This is fiction, and fiction needs to have a basis in story. What happens here is that a spacecraft is built, takes off, travels to a distant star (Kepler 438 is over 470 light years away), arrives and does a quick survey. That's all we get in the first volume. There is very little dramatic narrative. For a story to be engaging, there need to be obstacles overcome. Okay, there's the building of the huge craft (which bizarrely seems to be assembled on Earth, rather than in space) and the technology to enable faster-than-light travel (here wormhole-based) and stasis so most of the crew sleep their way to the destination - but there is no sense of anyone really making anything happen, and far too many characters are introduced to get any engagement.

There is one incident along the way (two if you count a stowaway cat) when in the agricultural zone 'Analysis of the hybrid's volatile organic compounds reveals a 58% match to known toxins' and the skeleton crew's executive officers are asked to determine next steps, but then on the next page we just get 'The threat has been contained and managed.' That's okay, then - dramatic tension or what? I can see the idea of the approach is to make it feel like a factual write up - but even non-fiction requires narrative and tension where things are overcome. And there is so little detail - for example we just get told there's 'recent development of advanced stasis technology, cryogenic stimulation and neurostimulation', and 'the hyperdrive's use of wormhole propulsion technology' - and that's about it.

Now it's possible that the drama and narrative content will build with future volumes. In the opening we are told that the information we receive forms 'part of a puzzling mosaic of information' and 'we hope the excitement that fuels this mission inspires you to join us in decoding these clues' - but as it stands at the end of volume 1, there seems very little to puzzle over and decode.

This is a genuinely original and innovative take on how to present science fiction. Innovation always comes with risk. You've got to be bold, and the team behind this book and more at the Kepler Files website (where the aim is to have more multimedia content in the future) are certainly that. But for me, beautiful though it is, taken as a science fiction book it doesn't do enough to engage me.

Hardback: At the time of review, the book is only available from the website address above, though it should be in bookshops soon.
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Andrew Jaffe - Five way interview

Andrew Jaffe is professor of astrophysics and cosmology at Imperial College, London and director of the Imperial Centre for Inference and Cosmology. His new book is The Random Universe. Why science? I’ve always been interested in science, in particular in  astronomy, astrophysics, and space. One of my earliest memories - back in nursery school in New Jersey, I think - was watching one of the moon launches. I wanted that excitement to be part of my life! I never got to be an astronaut, but I did get to be part of the Planck Satellite team, and was privileged to be able to travel to the ESA Spaceport in French Guiana to watch the launch.  In between, I was lucky enough to have a supportive family, get a good education, and find inspiring teachers, mentors, and collaborators. They helped me model the universe, and helped me learn how to refine those models in the face of experimental and observational evidence. That is, they taught me to be a scientist. Why this book? The Random...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more