Skip to main content

In the Blink of an Eye (SF) - Jo Callaghan *****

For someone who likes both science fiction and contemporary British police procedural novels, this is a gift. It features Detective Chief Superintendent Kat Frank - a senior police officer with even more baggage than is traditional for fictional detectives - being paired up with an AI detective called Lock in a trial to see if AI can aid detection. As it is a trial, they work on something well beneath the pay grade of a real DCS - missing person cold cases.

Jo Callaghan produces an excellent page turner of a mystery novel which would have worked without the science fiction element, but is really brought to the next level by the addition of Lock. Of itself, adding AI to police work is lab lit (i.e. perfectly possible with today's technology), but Lock is something else. In her acknowledgements, Callaghan says 'With the exception of Lock's real-time conversational abilities, many aspects of AI described in the book either exist now or are on the horizon' - this is stretching things in a big way. I'll come back to that later for purists, but it's not at all a problem for the reader unless you don't accept that this is science fiction.

Of course, the concept of putting an AI detective alongside a human partner is nothing new. One thing reading this book has made me realise is that I need to re-read Asimov's 1953 novel The Caves of Steel, which features a (far future) detective Elijah Baley who is teamed up with the robotic detective R. Daneel Olivaw. Just like Baley, in Callaghan's book Frank doesn't trust the AI and doesn't want to work with it - but in both cases they come to grudging mutual respect. Another parallel, which I think Callaghan could have made more of, is Data in Star Trek TNG. What makes Data so entertaining is the opportunity for humour in misunderstanding between the AI and the humans. Callaghan has a sequel on the way - I hope she can make a bit more of this aspect, which only comes out right at the end of the current book.

The big difference between the predecessors and Lock is that Lock is not a robot. He is pure software, but is able to project a totally lifelike 3D image, both of 'himself' (in various avatars) and of people who feature in the case, 3D data presentations and more. This allows for more of the kind of interactions that happen with the robots in the two predecessors mentioned than would have been the case if Lock had been a totally disembodied program.

This feature also takes us into the reason why, in reality, Lock is way beyond current technology. The idea of being able to project lifelike 3D images into thin air (especially from a bracelet, as is the case here) is not conceivable with any current technology. Early on, Callaghan has her irritating young AI professor gets things distinctly wrong in explaining the broad capability AGI (artificial general intelligence) that Lock has, effectively saying all you need to go from narrow AI to AGI is deep learning - which is actually what you need for good narrow AI such as large language models. It doesn't enable the human-like AGI we see here. So a degree of SF is required to make this feasible too.

 What the book does do, secondarily to the enjoyability as a straight SF story, is make you think about the opportunities for AI in policing - for example in checking many hours of CCTV or social media posts. This kind of thing is where Lock does very convincingly help the human team. The only proviso here is that, again, it's still in the realms of science fiction to think that the mobile data speeds portrayed - and the processing power at the server end - would be anything like practical in the near future. It's possible to imagine an AI like Lock that could watch a movie in seconds, or trawl through terabytes of data at high speed - but real world servers aren't going to pump out data fast enough, and even 5G would be way too slow to enable Lock to function (you certainly couldn't cram his capabilities into a bracelet) - not to mention that at the moment I'm lucky to get 4G in many locations.

Overall, there's a good balance here between the SF and mystery aspects (though there is a very predictable plot twist near the end). I enjoyed the book and the 5 stars is well-earned, despite the attempt to pretend it isn't science fiction. I'm looking forward to the sequel, particularly if we can see more of the potential for entertaining interplay between Frank and Lock. Good stuff.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...
Post a Comment
Read more