Skip to main content

Ten Tantalising Truths - John Gribbin ****

Veteran British science writer John Gribbin has produced a number of excellent short titles of late in the form of handsome little hardbacks along the lines of 'N somethingly somethings' - for example, Six Impossible Things and Eight Improbable Possibilities. In his latest, we get ten tantalising truths.

The book is subtitled 'why the sky is blue and other big answers to simple questions': in his preface, Gribbin tells us that these are all genuine questions he has been asked by younger members of his family. Amongst the topics are why the sky is dark at night, where did everything come from, why does blood taste salty like the sea, and why are men bigger than women (as well as that blue sky one).

Some of these are very familiar; others, even for adults, are in the realm of 'hmm, I never thought of that'. It might seem that what's being done here is similar to Alom Shaha's Why Don't Things Fall Up, but though there are overlaps, they are very different books. Both are suitable for beginners in science, and both happen to use 'why is the sky blue?' as one of their starting points. But Shaha's book is more about building a wide picture of science, starting from basic questions, and sticking to the science with very little context. By contrast, Gribbin takes each point and uses it both to bring in some history of science and to dive into a little more depth, while staying approachable. I liked both books and would say they are more complementary than competitive.

To get a feel for the approach here, let's look at a couple of the topics in a little more detail. In exploring why the sky is dark at night we start with the obvious - there's no Sun visible then - then jump to Thomas Digges in 1576, musing that there should be stars in all directions, but the distant ones would be too faint to see. Gribbin then develops the story with famous characters like Kepler and less so such as Jean-Philippe Loys de Chéseaux, leading onto Olbers and Poe who will be familiar to anyone who has read about this before. At the end of a parade of ideas, presented with enough context to never make it seem dull, we get a twist in the tail that brings in the big bang and seeing (or, rather, not seeing) the cosmic fireball in the gaps between the stars.

Gribbin usually sticks to physics, astronomy and cosmology, so it's interesting to see him venture into biology with a couple of questions, such as 'why are men bigger than women?'. As he points out straight away, of course not all men are bigger than all women, but around the world, the population averages for men's height are bigger than women's averages. We get a little introduction to natural selection before noting that 'men being larger than women must have been a successful evolutionary "strategy" for our ancestors'. (I think this isn't strictly true as evolution can produce characteristics that are not helpful if they are side effects of something that is particularly beneficial, but let's leave that aside.) In many species, though, particularly insects, the females are bigger. We then explore reproductive strategies before coming to the viewpoint that relative male size in mammals often reflects the number of females the male is in a group with.

The questions may have come from youngsters, but the writing style here is very much for an adult audience. I enjoyed it, though I would have preferred to have had more topics that were less frequently covered - it seemed odd to finish with the blue sky one, which crops up extremely frequently in popular science writing. Even so, a good addition to this elegant little collection.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...