Skip to main content

Ten Tantalising Truths - John Gribbin ****

Veteran British science writer John Gribbin has produced a number of excellent short titles of late in the form of handsome little hardbacks along the lines of 'N somethingly somethings' - for example, Six Impossible Things and Eight Improbable Possibilities. In his latest, we get ten tantalising truths.

The book is subtitled 'why the sky is blue and other big answers to simple questions': in his preface, Gribbin tells us that these are all genuine questions he has been asked by younger members of his family. Amongst the topics are why the sky is dark at night, where did everything come from, why does blood taste salty like the sea, and why are men bigger than women (as well as that blue sky one).

Some of these are very familiar; others, even for adults, are in the realm of 'hmm, I never thought of that'. It might seem that what's being done here is similar to Alom Shaha's Why Don't Things Fall Up, but though there are overlaps, they are very different books. Both are suitable for beginners in science, and both happen to use 'why is the sky blue?' as one of their starting points. But Shaha's book is more about building a wide picture of science, starting from basic questions, and sticking to the science with very little context. By contrast, Gribbin takes each point and uses it both to bring in some history of science and to dive into a little more depth, while staying approachable. I liked both books and would say they are more complementary than competitive.

To get a feel for the approach here, let's look at a couple of the topics in a little more detail. In exploring why the sky is dark at night we start with the obvious - there's no Sun visible then - then jump to Thomas Digges in 1576, musing that there should be stars in all directions, but the distant ones would be too faint to see. Gribbin then develops the story with famous characters like Kepler and less so such as Jean-Philippe Loys de Chéseaux, leading onto Olbers and Poe who will be familiar to anyone who has read about this before. At the end of a parade of ideas, presented with enough context to never make it seem dull, we get a twist in the tail that brings in the big bang and seeing (or, rather, not seeing) the cosmic fireball in the gaps between the stars.

Gribbin usually sticks to physics, astronomy and cosmology, so it's interesting to see him venture into biology with a couple of questions, such as 'why are men bigger than women?'. As he points out straight away, of course not all men are bigger than all women, but around the world, the population averages for men's height are bigger than women's averages. We get a little introduction to natural selection before noting that 'men being larger than women must have been a successful evolutionary "strategy" for our ancestors'. (I think this isn't strictly true as evolution can produce characteristics that are not helpful if they are side effects of something that is particularly beneficial, but let's leave that aside.) In many species, though, particularly insects, the females are bigger. We then explore reproductive strategies before coming to the viewpoint that relative male size in mammals often reflects the number of females the male is in a group with.

The questions may have come from youngsters, but the writing style here is very much for an adult audience. I enjoyed it, though I would have preferred to have had more topics that were less frequently covered - it seemed odd to finish with the blue sky one, which crops up extremely frequently in popular science writing. Even so, a good addition to this elegant little collection.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more