Skip to main content

Airside (SF) - Christopher Priest *****

There have been many attempts to define what science fiction is - I've always thought the most feeble is probably 'what SF writers write' - yet that's probably the best reason to call Airside science fiction. Christopher Priest has been a major force in the genre since the 1970s. Thanks to the film, he's probably best known for The Prestige, but his work has always challenged both the expected shape of what science fiction is and the reader's mind.

In some ways, Airside reminded me of Gene Wolfe's classic fantasy novel There Are Doors. These are both books where the reader is left for most of the book unsure as to quite what is going on. But Priest is able, far more so than Wolfe often was in his (brilliant) novels, to tie it all up at the end. I don't mean by this that there is a clear, everything explained scenario, but you are left thinking 'Aha, that's why we had that bit I didn't understand'.

According to the blurb, this is a book about the disappearance of a Hollywood actress in 1949. However, that is just one component in a much richer whole. The central character Justin is an obsessive film buff and professional writer on the subject. Perhaps in part because of a couple of childhood experiences, he is obsessed with airports and particularly their inner structures. He is also determined to find out what happened to Jeanette Marchard, the missing actress. All this comes together in a mix that also weaves in a number of Justin's reviews (of real films), which all tie into the structure of the book and Justin's worldview.

What is most surprising is how effective the book is given that a lot of is written more in the style of a long newspaper article than a novel. There is an awful lot of 'tell' rather than 'show', particularly when relating past events, and Priest makes frequent use of relatively short descriptive sentences. There isn't any dialogue to speak of until page 33, and although there are longer passages later, the journalistic style continues to dominate. This is clearly deliberate, and although it feels like it should make the book less easy to get into, somehow, it doesn't. I felt a pressure to read on, even though I was well aware there was unlikely to be a resolution of all the mysteries at the end.

Returning finally to whether or not this is science fiction, it certainly mostly isn't. There are a few elements that feel a little like fantasy, though you could see them as suggestions that there is something physical that connects certain locations, putting them outside the conventions of normal space. It has been remarked that Priest has a tendency to link landscapes and the psyche - here, the very particular landscapes of airport terminals - and particularly their weird-feeling no-persons'-land airside portions - do certainly have a kind of connection. If you come at this book expecting a typical SF novel, you will be disappointed. It is driven by a technology - but one that was futuristic in the original 1949 event, not now. But take it on with an open mind and it is both fascinating and surprisingly approachable for what could be regarded as piece of avant garde work 

I hesitate to use the word, but for me this is something of a masterpiece.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more