Skip to main content

Airside (SF) - Christopher Priest *****

There have been many attempts to define what science fiction is - I've always thought the most feeble is probably 'what SF writers write' - yet that's probably the best reason to call Airside science fiction. Christopher Priest has been a major force in the genre since the 1970s. Thanks to the film, he's probably best known for The Prestige, but his work has always challenged both the expected shape of what science fiction is and the reader's mind.

In some ways, Airside reminded me of Gene Wolfe's classic fantasy novel There Are Doors. These are both books where the reader is left for most of the book unsure as to quite what is going on. But Priest is able, far more so than Wolfe often was in his (brilliant) novels, to tie it all up at the end. I don't mean by this that there is a clear, everything explained scenario, but you are left thinking 'Aha, that's why we had that bit I didn't understand'.

According to the blurb, this is a book about the disappearance of a Hollywood actress in 1949. However, that is just one component in a much richer whole. The central character Justin is an obsessive film buff and professional writer on the subject. Perhaps in part because of a couple of childhood experiences, he is obsessed with airports and particularly their inner structures. He is also determined to find out what happened to Jeanette Marchard, the missing actress. All this comes together in a mix that also weaves in a number of Justin's reviews (of real films), which all tie into the structure of the book and Justin's worldview.

What is most surprising is how effective the book is given that a lot of is written more in the style of a long newspaper article than a novel. There is an awful lot of 'tell' rather than 'show', particularly when relating past events, and Priest makes frequent use of relatively short descriptive sentences. There isn't any dialogue to speak of until page 33, and although there are longer passages later, the journalistic style continues to dominate. This is clearly deliberate, and although it feels like it should make the book less easy to get into, somehow, it doesn't. I felt a pressure to read on, even though I was well aware there was unlikely to be a resolution of all the mysteries at the end.

Returning finally to whether or not this is science fiction, it certainly mostly isn't. There are a few elements that feel a little like fantasy, though you could see them as suggestions that there is something physical that connects certain locations, putting them outside the conventions of normal space. It has been remarked that Priest has a tendency to link landscapes and the psyche - here, the very particular landscapes of airport terminals - and particularly their weird-feeling no-persons'-land airside portions - do certainly have a kind of connection. If you come at this book expecting a typical SF novel, you will be disappointed. It is driven by a technology - but one that was futuristic in the original 1949 event, not now. But take it on with an open mind and it is both fascinating and surprisingly approachable for what could be regarded as piece of avant garde work 

I hesitate to use the word, but for me this is something of a masterpiece.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more