Skip to main content

Airside (SF) - Christopher Priest *****

There have been many attempts to define what science fiction is - I've always thought the most feeble is probably 'what SF writers write' - yet that's probably the best reason to call Airside science fiction. Christopher Priest has been a major force in the genre since the 1970s. Thanks to the film, he's probably best known for The Prestige, but his work has always challenged both the expected shape of what science fiction is and the reader's mind.

In some ways, Airside reminded me of Gene Wolfe's classic fantasy novel There Are Doors. These are both books where the reader is left for most of the book unsure as to quite what is going on. But Priest is able, far more so than Wolfe often was in his (brilliant) novels, to tie it all up at the end. I don't mean by this that there is a clear, everything explained scenario, but you are left thinking 'Aha, that's why we had that bit I didn't understand'.

According to the blurb, this is a book about the disappearance of a Hollywood actress in 1949. However, that is just one component in a much richer whole. The central character Justin is an obsessive film buff and professional writer on the subject. Perhaps in part because of a couple of childhood experiences, he is obsessed with airports and particularly their inner structures. He is also determined to find out what happened to Jeanette Marchard, the missing actress. All this comes together in a mix that also weaves in a number of Justin's reviews (of real films), which all tie into the structure of the book and Justin's worldview.

What is most surprising is how effective the book is given that a lot of is written more in the style of a long newspaper article than a novel. There is an awful lot of 'tell' rather than 'show', particularly when relating past events, and Priest makes frequent use of relatively short descriptive sentences. There isn't any dialogue to speak of until page 33, and although there are longer passages later, the journalistic style continues to dominate. This is clearly deliberate, and although it feels like it should make the book less easy to get into, somehow, it doesn't. I felt a pressure to read on, even though I was well aware there was unlikely to be a resolution of all the mysteries at the end.

Returning finally to whether or not this is science fiction, it certainly mostly isn't. There are a few elements that feel a little like fantasy, though you could see them as suggestions that there is something physical that connects certain locations, putting them outside the conventions of normal space. It has been remarked that Priest has a tendency to link landscapes and the psyche - here, the very particular landscapes of airport terminals - and particularly their weird-feeling no-persons'-land airside portions - do certainly have a kind of connection. If you come at this book expecting a typical SF novel, you will be disappointed. It is driven by a technology - but one that was futuristic in the original 1949 event, not now. But take it on with an open mind and it is both fascinating and surprisingly approachable for what could be regarded as piece of avant garde work 

I hesitate to use the word, but for me this is something of a masterpiece.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more