Jaime Green - Five Way Interview

Jaime Green is a science writer, essayist, editor, and teacher, and she is series editor of The Best American Science and Nature Writing. She received her MFA in Creative Nonfiction from Columbia, and her writing has appeared in Slate, Popular Science, The New York Times Book Review, American Theatre, Catapult, Astrobites, and elsewhere. She lives in Connecticut with her husband and son. Her new book is The Possibility of Life.

Why science?

On the one hand, a love for it was instilled in me from a young age, by my dad who loves space, and by my maternal grandfather, an engineer who loved gardening. But it really stuck with me. I think it's the mix of mystery and wonder, the amazing invisible things that are all around us—cells and atoms and fossils—and the sense of interconnectedness that comes from scientific understanding.

Why this book?

Astronomy has always been my favorite science, and when I read Carl Sagan in my teens, both Contact and Cosmos, he had a huge impact on me, that romantic but scientifically serious approach. But for a long time, I thought there wasn't room for my version of this book. There are so many books about the scientific search for alien life, and they're all written by professors of astronomy and astrophysics! But when I started writing about the science and sci-fi together, it all opened up, and I realized that looking at this as a question of imagination was so fascinating to me, and so exciting to write about. It doesn't diminish the science but recognizes that it's about more than finding answers, but looking for meaning, too.

Why do you think the idea of alien life we will probably never encounter excites people?

Well first of all, imagining the possibilities is a fascinating endeavour—they don't have to be real to be powerful. But whether or not there's life on other worlds, and what that life is like, has a huge impact on how we understand our place in the cosmos. Just knowing that they're out there would change so much.

What’s next?

I'm still figuring that out. I feel like I've said everything I ever wanted to say about astronomy and aliens, but writing this book led me to new interests in chemistry and biology, a topic that was pretty new to me in my writing. So I'm excited to see what new directions that might lead in.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Resting? Publishing a book is far more overwhelming than I could have imagined. It was a life-long dream, and now the book is in the world, it's almost too much to process. But I'm excited for spring, for some long walks in nature, for seeing what comes up in my garden despite my neglect.

Image by Sylvie Rosokoff

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog