Skip to main content

Jaime Green - Five Way Interview

Jaime Green is a science writer, essayist, editor, and teacher, and she is series editor of The Best American Science and Nature Writing. She received her MFA in Creative Nonfiction from Columbia, and her writing has appeared in Slate, Popular Science, The New York Times Book Review, American Theatre, Catapult, Astrobites, and elsewhere. She lives in Connecticut with her husband and son. Her new book is The Possibility of Life.

Why science?

On the one hand, a love for it was instilled in me from a young age, by my dad who loves space, and by my maternal grandfather, an engineer who loved gardening. But it really stuck with me. I think it's the mix of mystery and wonder, the amazing invisible things that are all around us—cells and atoms and fossils—and the sense of interconnectedness that comes from scientific understanding.

Why this book?

Astronomy has always been my favorite science, and when I read Carl Sagan in my teens, both Contact and Cosmos, he had a huge impact on me, that romantic but scientifically serious approach. But for a long time, I thought there wasn't room for my version of this book. There are so many books about the scientific search for alien life, and they're all written by professors of astronomy and astrophysics! But when I started writing about the science and sci-fi together, it all opened up, and I realized that looking at this as a question of imagination was so fascinating to me, and so exciting to write about. It doesn't diminish the science but recognizes that it's about more than finding answers, but looking for meaning, too.

Why do you think the idea of alien life we will probably never encounter excites people?

Well first of all, imagining the possibilities is a fascinating endeavour—they don't have to be real to be powerful. But whether or not there's life on other worlds, and what that life is like, has a huge impact on how we understand our place in the cosmos. Just knowing that they're out there would change so much.

What’s next?

I'm still figuring that out. I feel like I've said everything I ever wanted to say about astronomy and aliens, but writing this book led me to new interests in chemistry and biology, a topic that was pretty new to me in my writing. So I'm excited to see what new directions that might lead in.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Resting? Publishing a book is far more overwhelming than I could have imagined. It was a life-long dream, and now the book is in the world, it's almost too much to process. But I'm excited for spring, for some long walks in nature, for seeing what comes up in my garden despite my neglect.

Image by Sylvie Rosokoff









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re