Skip to main content

Jaime Green - Five Way Interview

Jaime Green is a science writer, essayist, editor, and teacher, and she is series editor of The Best American Science and Nature Writing. She received her MFA in Creative Nonfiction from Columbia, and her writing has appeared in Slate, Popular Science, The New York Times Book Review, American Theatre, Catapult, Astrobites, and elsewhere. She lives in Connecticut with her husband and son. Her new book is The Possibility of Life.

Why science?

On the one hand, a love for it was instilled in me from a young age, by my dad who loves space, and by my maternal grandfather, an engineer who loved gardening. But it really stuck with me. I think it's the mix of mystery and wonder, the amazing invisible things that are all around us—cells and atoms and fossils—and the sense of interconnectedness that comes from scientific understanding.

Why this book?

Astronomy has always been my favorite science, and when I read Carl Sagan in my teens, both Contact and Cosmos, he had a huge impact on me, that romantic but scientifically serious approach. But for a long time, I thought there wasn't room for my version of this book. There are so many books about the scientific search for alien life, and they're all written by professors of astronomy and astrophysics! But when I started writing about the science and sci-fi together, it all opened up, and I realized that looking at this as a question of imagination was so fascinating to me, and so exciting to write about. It doesn't diminish the science but recognizes that it's about more than finding answers, but looking for meaning, too.

Why do you think the idea of alien life we will probably never encounter excites people?

Well first of all, imagining the possibilities is a fascinating endeavour—they don't have to be real to be powerful. But whether or not there's life on other worlds, and what that life is like, has a huge impact on how we understand our place in the cosmos. Just knowing that they're out there would change so much.

What’s next?

I'm still figuring that out. I feel like I've said everything I ever wanted to say about astronomy and aliens, but writing this book led me to new interests in chemistry and biology, a topic that was pretty new to me in my writing. So I'm excited to see what new directions that might lead in.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Resting? Publishing a book is far more overwhelming than I could have imagined. It was a life-long dream, and now the book is in the world, it's almost too much to process. But I'm excited for spring, for some long walks in nature, for seeing what comes up in my garden despite my neglect.

Image by Sylvie Rosokoff









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...