Skip to main content

Quantum Supremacy - Michio Kaku ***

Douglas Adams in The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy points out that the guide starts off frenetically, commenting on how mind-bogglingly big space is, but 'after a while it settles down a bit and it starts telling you things you actually want to know…' Quantum Supremacy is written in this style. To begin with, the reader is battered with all the amazing things quantum computers will (or at least might be able to) do, but eventually things calm down and we get onto some useful content.

What you won't find here is any detail on the nature of quantum computers, how they work or on the very significant challenges faced in achieving anything that is to become mainstream. This is all treated at even higher level than a serious newspaper article would. What Michio Kaku is interested in is the potential applications, and the book takes us through a significant number of these.

You will read how quantum computers have the potential to transform our understanding of biology (physicists love telling biologists how they can do the job better), deal with green energy, transform medical cures, enhance AI, take a step towards immortality, predict and deal with with climate change and enable us to make far better cosmological models. It's heady stuff, and as always Kaku's viewpoint is both very positive and bolstered by an enthusiasm for science fiction (we even get a little SF story in 'a day in the Year 2050').

Of all those topics, for me by far the most interesting was the relatively short section on AI and quantum computing. AI is currently taking one of its occasional leaps forward with the likes of Chat-GPT, and Kaku looks at the ways in which AI and quantum computers could assist in dealing with each others weaknesses, enabling a transformational ability to make effective use of the vast amount of information now available to us online. Arguably, the book is worth reading for this alone.

However, there are some downsides to the approach taken. Kaku repeatedly overemphasises current capabilities. As the title suggests, we are told we have reached quantum supremacy, when quantum computers can far exceed the abilities of conventional computers. What is not made so clear is that this supremacy has only occurred with devices that are each focused on dealing with a very particular challenge, and that can't be applied to the real world in any way. This isn't just a failing of Kaku's, but the industry terminology. As he points out, in 2023 a senior figure at IBM said that within the next couple of years we will be able to 'reach a demonstration of quantum advantage - something that can have practical value.' Quantum advantage, which sounds trivial when compared with quantum supremacy, is actually far harder (and more important) to obtain - and even this statement isn't about general purpose quantum advantage. Kaku does not make clear at all how very specific quantum computing algorithms tend to be - these devices will never provide general purpose advantage.

The big problem here, and it's partly because we are given so little on how the computers work - and don't work - is the way that practically every application Kaku lists is 'may be' or 'might be able to'. We're a long way from knowing for sure how quantum computing can address more than a handful of requirements, such as calculating prime factors or speeding up search (the latter, of course, is a big prize for search engine companies). Even if quantum computers could address some of the issues Kaku lists - and we're never told how they would go about addressing them - it's not even always clear how the data could be collected to make their efforts usable.

Quantum computing is important. As Kaku points out, a huge amount of money has been invested in it, and it will become more practical for very specific applications, even if it's never commercially feasible outside of big data centres, so for most will be a cloud facility if used at all. And parts of some of Kaku's suggested applications will probably become reality. But the scattergun approach of describing possible applications without the practicalities doesn't really do justice to the issue.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe t    o a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more