Skip to main content

Quantum Supremacy - Michio Kaku ***

Douglas Adams in The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy points out that the guide starts off frenetically, commenting on how mind-bogglingly big space is, but 'after a while it settles down a bit and it starts telling you things you actually want to know…' Quantum Supremacy is written in this style. To begin with, the reader is battered with all the amazing things quantum computers will (or at least might be able to) do, but eventually things calm down and we get onto some useful content.

What you won't find here is any detail on the nature of quantum computers, how they work or on the very significant challenges faced in achieving anything that is to become mainstream. This is all treated at even higher level than a serious newspaper article would. What Michio Kaku is interested in is the potential applications, and the book takes us through a significant number of these.

You will read how quantum computers have the potential to transform our understanding of biology (physicists love telling biologists how they can do the job better), deal with green energy, transform medical cures, enhance AI, take a step towards immortality, predict and deal with with climate change and enable us to make far better cosmological models. It's heady stuff, and as always Kaku's viewpoint is both very positive and bolstered by an enthusiasm for science fiction (we even get a little SF story in 'a day in the Year 2050').

Of all those topics, for me by far the most interesting was the relatively short section on AI and quantum computing. AI is currently taking one of its occasional leaps forward with the likes of Chat-GPT, and Kaku looks at the ways in which AI and quantum computers could assist in dealing with each others weaknesses, enabling a transformational ability to make effective use of the vast amount of information now available to us online. Arguably, the book is worth reading for this alone.

However, there are some downsides to the approach taken. Kaku repeatedly overemphasises current capabilities. As the title suggests, we are told we have reached quantum supremacy, when quantum computers can far exceed the abilities of conventional computers. What is not made so clear is that this supremacy has only occurred with devices that are each focused on dealing with a very particular challenge, and that can't be applied to the real world in any way. This isn't just a failing of Kaku's, but the industry terminology. As he points out, in 2023 a senior figure at IBM said that within the next couple of years we will be able to 'reach a demonstration of quantum advantage - something that can have practical value.' Quantum advantage, which sounds trivial when compared with quantum supremacy, is actually far harder (and more important) to obtain - and even this statement isn't about general purpose quantum advantage. Kaku does not make clear at all how very specific quantum computing algorithms tend to be - these devices will never provide general purpose advantage.

The big problem here, and it's partly because we are given so little on how the computers work - and don't work - is the way that practically every application Kaku lists is 'may be' or 'might be able to'. We're a long way from knowing for sure how quantum computing can address more than a handful of requirements, such as calculating prime factors or speeding up search (the latter, of course, is a big prize for search engine companies). Even if quantum computers could address some of the issues Kaku lists - and we're never told how they would go about addressing them - it's not even always clear how the data could be collected to make their efforts usable.

Quantum computing is important. As Kaku points out, a huge amount of money has been invested in it, and it will become more practical for very specific applications, even if it's never commercially feasible outside of big data centres, so for most will be a cloud facility if used at all. And parts of some of Kaku's suggested applications will probably become reality. But the scattergun approach of describing possible applications without the practicalities doesn't really do justice to the issue.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe t    o a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more