Skip to main content

The Possibility of Life - Jaime Green ****

This is a book about extraterrestrial life, and it isn’t all science. For me, that’s what made it such a rivetingly good read, although (speaking as a former astrophysicist) I can’t imagine saying that about any other popular science subject. I’d be very dubious, for example, about a quantum physics primer that contained a detailed account of Ant-Man’s experiences in the Quantum Realm. That’s because quantum physics is real science, with real experimental results and real practical applications – and it doesn’t need a sci-fi take on it to bring it to life. Aliens aren’t like that.

Yes, I know there’s a well-established branch of science called astrobiology – I’ve even written a book about it. But astrobiology deals with the search for extraterrestrial life, not the nature of extraterrestrials themselves, about which there’s no data. Books like mine are interesting for people who want to know how real scientists think and work – how they decide what sort of evidence to look for, and then design instruments to do that – but they can be frustrating for readers who just want to know something about the aliens themselves. Jaime Green classifies my kind of ‘whether or not’ questions about aliens as ‘very boring’ – which I think is a little harsh, though I won’t dispute that the ‘what if’ questions she focuses on instead are by far the more interesting ones.

When I said the book ‘isn’t all science’, I was referring to the fact that it’s a roughly 50/50 mix between science fictional portrayals of aliens and ideas that various scientists – many of them interviewed by Green for this book – have about them. But even the latter tend to be more speculative than scientific in nature. The scientific method depends on consensus, and mature branches of science – such as quantum physics – are based on a very strong consensus. On the other hand, even the most basic questions about extraterrestrial life have no meaningful consensus at all. How likely is it, for example, that an intelligent alien would be roughly the same size and shape as a human being? Green quotes some scientists who say it’s pretty certain they would be, while others consider the idea ludicrously improbable.

With such a lack of consensus, the field is wide open for ‘what if’ type speculation – and that’s what this book is all about. What makes it such a fascinating and enjoyable read is that it’s all intelligent, well-informed speculation – and that applies just as much to the sci-fi scenarios that Green picks out as it does to the views of the scientists she speaks to. It’s also surprising just how many different topics there are to speculate about. The book’s half-dozen chapters progress from the nature of life and the kind of planets it might be found on, through the types of lifeforms that might exist and how they might display intelligence, to the possibilities of alien technology and language.

It’s fascinating to read a book that’s ostensibly on the same subject as one I wrote myself, yet actually has almost no overlap with it. Jaime Green’s book won’t tell you much about how astrobiologists set about searching for alien life, but unless you’re a particular kind of science nerd you’re probably not very interested in that anyway. What most people really want to know is what aliens might be like – and that’s something I’ve never seen discussed quite as brilliantly or entertainingly as here.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Andrew May - Subscribe to a weekly digest of all our reviews and more for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more