Skip to main content

Dan Levitt - Five Way Interview

Dan Levitt spent over 25 years writing, producing and directing award-winning documentaries for National Geographic, Discovery, Science, History, HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Institute).  He has filmed with Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, Bernard Carr, and Sean B. Carroll among many others. His latest book is What's Gotten Into You?

Why science?

I’ve always been drawn to the beauty of science. It offers me a way to appreciate the natural world and the fantastic physical, chemical, and biological web we’re part of. I think my sense of that deepened when I lived for a few years near a game park in Kenya. There was a small rainforest close by and everywhere I walked I had a view of Mount Kilimanjaro. It gave me a visceral sense of how enmeshed we are in a much larger ecosystem. Of course, science also helps us understand things that would otherwise be inexplicable, like the question at the heart of this book—how did we end up here?

Why this book?

The inspiration came when I realized that I really didn’t know what my body was made of, much less where that stuff ultimately came from. Once I realized that every particle within me sprang out of the Big Bang, I was hooked. I began wondering what happened— how did particles that were zipping around 13.8 billion years ago end up creating us?

At the same time, I began wondering how we are able to peer back billions of years in time. How did we do that? Those were the questions that started me off and I just kept thinking about them until I decided I would write the book.

In researching this book, what did you find most surprising?

I had never realized that life itself profoundly influenced our planet’s geology. Once photosynthesizing cyanobacteria came along, they began releasing oxygen that transformed Earth and made it possible for more complex cells and creatures to evolve.

I didn’t know some scientists suspect that the first life on Earth might have been microbes that hitched a ride on meteorites from Mars.

Something else that surprised me was how often scientists were initially dismissive of theories that we now recognize were groundbreaking. After finishing the first draft of my book, I circled back to try to understand why and I saw that cognitive biases had cropped up again and again. I ended up giving them nicknames, like the 'Too Weird to be True' bias and the 'As an Expert, I’ve Lost Sight of How Much Is Still Unknown' bias. I hadn’t expected to be thinking about cognitive biases at all.

What’s next?

First a really good vacation. Then I’ll be writing another book about scientific discovery. I haven’t settled on the topic yet, but I had a great time writing What’s Gotten Into You. It led me to think about so many things that I hadn’t expected to, so I’m looking forward to the next one.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’ve been listening to War and Peace on audiobook and loving it. Tolstoy is a master at making you feel like you’re present in the scene. I’ve also been playing with ChatGPT a bit and trying to understand what it will be capable of. At this point I can tell you that it’s a long way off from writing like Tolstoy.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more