Skip to main content

Dan Levitt - Five Way Interview

Dan Levitt spent over 25 years writing, producing and directing award-winning documentaries for National Geographic, Discovery, Science, History, HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Institute).  He has filmed with Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, Bernard Carr, and Sean B. Carroll among many others. His latest book is What's Gotten Into You?

Why science?

I’ve always been drawn to the beauty of science. It offers me a way to appreciate the natural world and the fantastic physical, chemical, and biological web we’re part of. I think my sense of that deepened when I lived for a few years near a game park in Kenya. There was a small rainforest close by and everywhere I walked I had a view of Mount Kilimanjaro. It gave me a visceral sense of how enmeshed we are in a much larger ecosystem. Of course, science also helps us understand things that would otherwise be inexplicable, like the question at the heart of this book—how did we end up here?

Why this book?

The inspiration came when I realized that I really didn’t know what my body was made of, much less where that stuff ultimately came from. Once I realized that every particle within me sprang out of the Big Bang, I was hooked. I began wondering what happened— how did particles that were zipping around 13.8 billion years ago end up creating us?

At the same time, I began wondering how we are able to peer back billions of years in time. How did we do that? Those were the questions that started me off and I just kept thinking about them until I decided I would write the book.

In researching this book, what did you find most surprising?

I had never realized that life itself profoundly influenced our planet’s geology. Once photosynthesizing cyanobacteria came along, they began releasing oxygen that transformed Earth and made it possible for more complex cells and creatures to evolve.

I didn’t know some scientists suspect that the first life on Earth might have been microbes that hitched a ride on meteorites from Mars.

Something else that surprised me was how often scientists were initially dismissive of theories that we now recognize were groundbreaking. After finishing the first draft of my book, I circled back to try to understand why and I saw that cognitive biases had cropped up again and again. I ended up giving them nicknames, like the 'Too Weird to be True' bias and the 'As an Expert, I’ve Lost Sight of How Much Is Still Unknown' bias. I hadn’t expected to be thinking about cognitive biases at all.

What’s next?

First a really good vacation. Then I’ll be writing another book about scientific discovery. I haven’t settled on the topic yet, but I had a great time writing What’s Gotten Into You. It led me to think about so many things that I hadn’t expected to, so I’m looking forward to the next one.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’ve been listening to War and Peace on audiobook and loving it. Tolstoy is a master at making you feel like you’re present in the scene. I’ve also been playing with ChatGPT a bit and trying to understand what it will be capable of. At this point I can tell you that it’s a long way off from writing like Tolstoy.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more