Skip to main content

Jules Howard - Four Way Interview

Pictured with his dog Ozzy, Jules Howard is a UK-based wildlife expert, zoology correspondent, science writer and broadcaster. He is the author of four non-fiction books including Sex on Earth and Death on Earth, the latter shortlisted for the Royal Society of Biology book prize. Jules writes for The Guardian, BBC Wildlife an BBC Focus and appears regularly on TV. His latest book is Wonderdog: How the science of dogs changed the science of life.

Why science?

Years ago, I would have answered this question by pointing to the applications of the sciences – how science gives us things, tools, ideas, exciting techniques and inventions. But, since I began writing about zoology more than a decade ago, I realise it’s about more than that. Many scientists I meet pursue science because they are inherently interested in the boundary between known and unknown. Many appreciate that they are merely baton holders for future generations, who will continue to chip away at that boundary and develop the human understanding of the world. In a funny way, science is far closer to art than I used to appreciate.

Why this book?

In recent years, it’s become clear that dogs are one of the finest methods we have for understanding the minds of animals – what they think, feel and experience of the world. We know, through dogs, that mammals can feel powerful attachments with one another that differ only by degree to our own; that the emotional centres of their brains light up like ours do; that they can perform word-mapping tasks that outcompete most three-year-olds; that sociality is built into their genes. For me, dogs offer us a ‘gateway’ through which we can investigate animal minds in a broader context. I wanted to tell the story of how we got here: through Darwin, Pavlov, Skinner and into the modern cognitive sciences, courtesy of some spectacular scientists (and their dogs!) along the way.

What's next?

Dogs will continue to be my focus for a while yet, but there are other projects I’m working on. For instance, I am currently sat at my kitchen table surrounded by books and research papers about the Pre-Cambrian, researching a world before animals (as we know them) existed. I am hoping to put a new spin on the story of how animals evolved, re-framing animal evolution from a perspective not considered in most popular science books. The children’s books are continuing, too. I find writing for younger age groups keeps up my 'awe' levels and this enthuses and energises much of my other writing.

What's exciting you at the moment?

Since writing Wonderdog, I’m really enjoying connecting with scientists involved in animal cognition research and developing my relationships with them. What I love about these scientists is that they have such a true devotion to ensuring their research can be used to positively influence the way we treat dogs in society – shaping policies, procedures and best practice to ensure that dogs are provided with the best environment to flourish. It’s been such an amazing thing to connect with this community and every day I am over-awed by their knowledge, commitment and friendliness.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more