Skip to main content

The Clockwork Man (SF) - E. V. Odle ***

This 1923 novel by Edwin Vincent Odle is a title that many with an interest in the history of science fiction will have heard of, but few are  likely to have read. It's often described as the first cyborg story (I did so myself in my book on science fiction and science Ten Billion Tomorrows). But it was overshadowed by the publication in the same year of Karel ÄŒapek's play Rossum's Universal Robots - the origin of the English language word 'robot'. Odle's only novel is not a great book, so that overshadowing is unsurprising, and even the cyborg description is more than a little misleading.

This is a romance (literally - it features two courting couples), but not so much a scientific romance (as early SF was often described), more a mythic romance. The titular clockwork man turns up from 8,000 years in the future at a village cricket match, producing some sub-Jerome K. Jerome style humour as a result of his wacky behaviour. He is a cyborg in the sense that he is a human that has been fitted with a piece of what appears to be technology. But this 'technology' is no more science-based that the wings of Daedalus and Icarus were in Ancient Greek mythology. The back of the clockwork man's head features an extremely complex clock that somehow magically takes him outside of time and space, able to shape both of them at will.

The clock seems to have been put in place to remove the war-like tendencies of men from the world. Odle was peripheral to the Bloomsbury set and the underlying theme of the book seems to be a Bloomsburyesque commentary on the role of women and men - and that's the whole point of it. The clockwork man makes no sense scientifically: he is simply a vehicle, like Daedalus and Icarus's wax-fixed wings, to (heavy handedly) make a point about human relations. This heavy handedness comes through particularly in one character, Doctor Armstrong, whose role is primarily to spend ages anguishing over how impossible the clockwork man is, unable to accept the existence of this creature from the future because he disrupts Armstrong's Edwardian pipe and slippers view of how human life should be (complete with servant wife), and should continue to be forever.

It's good that the Radium Age series in which this book is published gives readers the chance to encounter a title that is often held up as a starting point of an important science fiction trope. But when read, it shows us that the book is neither a particularly good work of fiction, nor does it play much of a meaningful part in SF history. The clockwork man is no more a cyborg than Talos, the huge bronze automaton in Greek mythology, was a robot. (To be fair, ÄŒapek's robots weren't robots either, they were androids.) This is an interesting oddity, but no more than that.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book