Skip to main content

White Fang Goes Dingo (SF) - Thomas Disch ***(*)

In the 1960s, science fiction underwent a revolution, often called the new wave. For many authors of the time, the 'hard' science and two-dimensional characterisation of Isaac Asimov and other writers from the 30s-50s was considered naive. The new young things preferred more human-centred stories, more experimental writing, darker topics and would sometimes indulge in total abandonment of the conventional story form.

A lot of the output of the period could be classed as interesting but failed experimentation - which is not a bad thing. It is arguably an essential for real creativity. This means that much of the output doesn't stand the test of time. But some authors, including Thomas Disch, produced some remarkable fiction. This collection of short stories, first published in 1966 under the title 102 H-bombs is an effective illustration of both what was good and bad about the period. Some of the stories are powerful, effective and original - others don't work at all.

Interestingly, the cover of my 1971 edition (which has some extra material) doesn't include the subtitle, but inside we read this is, in full, White Fang Goes Dingo and other funny s.f. stories. This isn't a bad description, as long as you accept that 'funny' can mean both humorous and odd. Some of the stories are very odd. But all are worth at least trying.

For me, three stand out. The first is the opener, the long 102 H-bombs, where what appears to be a fairly conventional future dystopia takes a sudden, unexpected and shocking twist. Another excellent long short is the closing White Fang Goes Dingo. Here, as is often the case with stories of this period, it can take the reader quite a while to work out what is going on, but Disch presents us with a classic dissection of the concept of utopia and what it is to be human.

The third story I particularly like is totally different: much more clearly intended as humour, in the form of a mock-scientific paper, written with another of the new wavers whose work has to some extend stood the test of time, John Sladek. Titled The Discovery of the Nullitron, it feels like an affection dig at the physics of the period, when new particles seemed to be discovered every other week and the nature of physics was undergoing a radical change, becoming extremely difficult for the lay person to understand. The authors describe their discovery of nullitron (and antinullitron), particles, which have mass, charge and spin of zero. Things soon veer into the absurd when we discover that a nullitron is red and about a metre across (and has a distinct flavour of liquorice). The surrealism gets deeper and deeper, but somehow the writing continues to be amusing rather than silly.

There are a total of 19 stories in the collection (a few are more fantasy than SF) - there's enough variety here to appeal to most SF tastes that aren't limited to space opera. Somehow, this collection manages to demonstrate both why the new wave was so important in advancing the quality of science fiction - and why I'm really pleased that we have moved on from it. A fascinating period piece. 

Unfortunately, this book is out of print, but there are second-hand copies around.

Paperback: 

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
-
See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Keep a Plane in the Sky - Alex Davies ****

If there's one big gap in the science writing sphere, it's popular engineering (you can quibble over whether engineering is science, but where else would you put popular engineering?). Alex Davies does the field a real service with this insightful introduction to the world of test engineering. The concept is simple. If we build something and sell it, we need to test it to make sure that it won't fail in a way that's dangerous to the consumer. The most obvious example is airliners, which feature at some length, but this applies to everything from cuddly toys to hair straighteners: someone needs to predict what could go wrong and to put the product through its paces to see if it will survive under any reasonable circumstances. When Davies is telling a story of test engineering in action, the book is a delight. He opens with the way that real bears are used to test if bears can get into coolers and trash cans - and the impressive ways these animals can  circumvent human in...
Post a Comment
Read more

On the Equality of All Things - Carlo Rovelli ****

There is a wide gulf between the worldviews of physicists and philosophers. Many physicists present a rather sweetly naive, child-like view of the world, where philosophers bring a distinctly more adult, cynical tone. This being the case, it can be a little worrying when a physicist dips a toe into the philosophical mire. Infamously, in The Grand Design , Stephen Hawking and co-author Leonard Mlodinow told us that philosophy was now dead because science could deal with anything it had previously been needed for. Thankfully, Carlo Rovelli is not trying to do away with philosophy, though it has to be said that when he veers into the topic that physicist's naivety can make it feel like the philosophising of an earnest eighteen-year-old. Take the opening paragraph, which tells us 'electrons and minds, stones and laws, judgements and galaxies do not essentially differ in nature from one another. They are notions that illuminate each other'. I almost expected a Pink Floyd soundtr...
Post a Comment
Read more