Skip to main content

White Fang Goes Dingo (SF) - Thomas Disch ***(*)

In the 1960s, science fiction underwent a revolution, often called the new wave. For many authors of the time, the 'hard' science and two-dimensional characterisation of Isaac Asimov and other writers from the 30s-50s was considered naive. The new young things preferred more human-centred stories, more experimental writing, darker topics and would sometimes indulge in total abandonment of the conventional story form.

A lot of the output of the period could be classed as interesting but failed experimentation - which is not a bad thing. It is arguably an essential for real creativity. This means that much of the output doesn't stand the test of time. But some authors, including Thomas Disch, produced some remarkable fiction. This collection of short stories, first published in 1966 under the title 102 H-bombs is an effective illustration of both what was good and bad about the period. Some of the stories are powerful, effective and original - others don't work at all.

Interestingly, the cover of my 1971 edition (which has some extra material) doesn't include the subtitle, but inside we read this is, in full, White Fang Goes Dingo and other funny s.f. stories. This isn't a bad description, as long as you accept that 'funny' can mean both humorous and odd. Some of the stories are very odd. But all are worth at least trying.

For me, three stand out. The first is the opener, the long 102 H-bombs, where what appears to be a fairly conventional future dystopia takes a sudden, unexpected and shocking twist. Another excellent long short is the closing White Fang Goes Dingo. Here, as is often the case with stories of this period, it can take the reader quite a while to work out what is going on, but Disch presents us with a classic dissection of the concept of utopia and what it is to be human.

The third story I particularly like is totally different: much more clearly intended as humour, in the form of a mock-scientific paper, written with another of the new wavers whose work has to some extend stood the test of time, John Sladek. Titled The Discovery of the Nullitron, it feels like an affection dig at the physics of the period, when new particles seemed to be discovered every other week and the nature of physics was undergoing a radical change, becoming extremely difficult for the lay person to understand. The authors describe their discovery of nullitron (and antinullitron), particles, which have mass, charge and spin of zero. Things soon veer into the absurd when we discover that a nullitron is red and about a metre across (and has a distinct flavour of liquorice). The surrealism gets deeper and deeper, but somehow the writing continues to be amusing rather than silly.

There are a total of 19 stories in the collection (a few are more fantasy than SF) - there's enough variety here to appeal to most SF tastes that aren't limited to space opera. Somehow, this collection manages to demonstrate both why the new wave was so important in advancing the quality of science fiction - and why I'm really pleased that we have moved on from it. A fascinating period piece. 

Unfortunately, this book is out of print, but there are second-hand copies around.

Paperback: 

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
-
See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more