Skip to main content

White Fang Goes Dingo (SF) - Thomas Disch ***(*)

In the 1960s, science fiction underwent a revolution, often called the new wave. For many authors of the time, the 'hard' science and two-dimensional characterisation of Isaac Asimov and other writers from the 30s-50s was considered naive. The new young things preferred more human-centred stories, more experimental writing, darker topics and would sometimes indulge in total abandonment of the conventional story form.

A lot of the output of the period could be classed as interesting but failed experimentation - which is not a bad thing. It is arguably an essential for real creativity. This means that much of the output doesn't stand the test of time. But some authors, including Thomas Disch, produced some remarkable fiction. This collection of short stories, first published in 1966 under the title 102 H-bombs is an effective illustration of both what was good and bad about the period. Some of the stories are powerful, effective and original - others don't work at all.

Interestingly, the cover of my 1971 edition (which has some extra material) doesn't include the subtitle, but inside we read this is, in full, White Fang Goes Dingo and other funny s.f. stories. This isn't a bad description, as long as you accept that 'funny' can mean both humorous and odd. Some of the stories are very odd. But all are worth at least trying.

For me, three stand out. The first is the opener, the long 102 H-bombs, where what appears to be a fairly conventional future dystopia takes a sudden, unexpected and shocking twist. Another excellent long short is the closing White Fang Goes Dingo. Here, as is often the case with stories of this period, it can take the reader quite a while to work out what is going on, but Disch presents us with a classic dissection of the concept of utopia and what it is to be human.

The third story I particularly like is totally different: much more clearly intended as humour, in the form of a mock-scientific paper, written with another of the new wavers whose work has to some extend stood the test of time, John Sladek. Titled The Discovery of the Nullitron, it feels like an affection dig at the physics of the period, when new particles seemed to be discovered every other week and the nature of physics was undergoing a radical change, becoming extremely difficult for the lay person to understand. The authors describe their discovery of nullitron (and antinullitron), particles, which have mass, charge and spin of zero. Things soon veer into the absurd when we discover that a nullitron is red and about a metre across (and has a distinct flavour of liquorice). The surrealism gets deeper and deeper, but somehow the writing continues to be amusing rather than silly.

There are a total of 19 stories in the collection (a few are more fantasy than SF) - there's enough variety here to appeal to most SF tastes that aren't limited to space opera. Somehow, this collection manages to demonstrate both why the new wave was so important in advancing the quality of science fiction - and why I'm really pleased that we have moved on from it. A fascinating period piece. 

Unfortunately, this book is out of print, but there are second-hand copies around.

Paperback: 

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
-
See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Philip Ball - How Life Works Interview

Philip Ball is one of the most versatile science writers operating today, covering topics from colour and music to modern myths and the new biology. He is also a broadcaster, and was an editor at Nature for more than twenty years. He writes regularly in the scientific and popular media and has written many books on the interactions of the sciences, the arts, and wider culture, including Bright Earth: The Invention of Colour, The Music Instinct, and Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything. His book Critical Mass won the 2005 Aventis Prize for Science Books. Ball is also a presenter of Science Stories, the BBC Radio 4 series on the history of science. He trained as a chemist at the University of Oxford and as a physicist at the University of Bristol. He is also the author of The Modern Myths. He lives in London. His latest title is How Life Works . Your book is about the ’new biology’ - how new is ’new’? Great question – because there might be some dispute about that! Many

Stephen Hawking: Genius at Work - Roger Highfield ****

It is easy to suspect that a biographical book from highly-illustrated publisher Dorling Kindersley would be mostly high level fluff, so I was pleasantly surprised at the depth Roger Highfield has worked into this large-format title. Yes, we get some of the ephemera so beloved of such books, such as a whole page dedicated to Hawking's coxing blazer - but there is plenty on Hawking's scientific life and particularly on his many scientific ideas. I've read a couple of biographies of Hawking, but I still came across aspects of his lesser fields here that I didn't remember, as well as the inevitable topics, ranging from Hawking radiation to his attempts to quell the out-of-control nature of the possible string theory universes. We also get plenty of coverage of what could be classified as Hawking the celebrity, whether it be a photograph with the Obamas in the White House, his appearances on Star Trek TNG and The Big Bang Theory or representations of him in the Simpsons. Ha

The Blind Spot - Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser and Evan Thompson ****

This is a curate's egg - sections are gripping, others rather dull. Overall the writing could be better... but the central message is fascinating and the book gets four stars despite everything because of this. That central message is that, as the subtitle says, science can't ignore human experience. This is not a cry for 'my truth'. The concept comes from scientists and philosophers of science. Instead it refers to the way that it is very easy to make a handful of mistakes about what we are doing with science, as a result of which most people (including many scientists) totally misunderstand the process and the implications. At the heart of this is confusing mathematical models with reality. It's all too easy when a mathematical model matches observation well to think of that model and its related concepts as factual. What the authors describe as 'the blind spot' is a combination of a number of such errors. These include what the authors call 'the bifur