Skip to main content

The Music Instinct - Philip Ball ****

A remarkable book exploring the nature of music, how it's written and how it affects us. It was published back in 2010, but I've only just come across it, and it hasn't aged at all.

I suspect I am in many ways the perfect audience - I have sung for many years and read music, but have no formal musical training. At the same time, I find the science behind it all fascinating. However, Philip Ball's analysis is of far more than how music works physically and how it influences the brain - though that's all in here. To an extent this is a love letter to music. It shows us why music is so important to our lives. How it fulfils far more than simply to act as auditory cheesecake (as Steven Pinker described it) both in terms of the mechanics of music itself and the ways that it insinuates itself into so many spheres of activity.

I challenge anyone with an interest in music to read this book and not come away with new and interesting insights. If you are a music expert, the science side will fill in some gaps in your knowledge, while if you like music but haven't much of a clue what's going on under the bonnet, there's an opportunity to get into the guts of what's happening, whether your preferences are Mozart or Stravinsky, Charlie Parker or Pink Floyd. (Or all the above.)

The only reason the book doesn't get five stars is that I suspect that Ball allowed his enthusiasm for the subject to carry him away a little. The Music Instinct is a tad too long, and gives too much detail on some of the more esoteric aspects of musical theory. Even so, this was a book I was eager to come back to every time I put it down (which is rarely the case with a book of this length or intensity).

There are many examples in the book, shown in musical notation, but accompanied by samples to listen to, though unfortunately at the time of writing they are not available. [Addition: thanks to Philip Ball for pointing out that the samples are available on the US publisher's website here.] Although it's not always possible easily pinpoint the specific bit of the music referred to, the availability of streaming services such as Spotify and Apple Music meant that I was able to listen to unfamiliar pieces like Berg's Lyric Suite to get a better feel for what Ball was addressing.

Neither a music theory nor a science of music book (but with enough science to count as a popular science book), The Music Instinct pulls together the importance of music and its impact on human beings in an impressive fashion. There is no musical snobbishness here - it's for any music lover.

Paperback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...