Rob Dunn - Four Way Interview

Photo by Amanda Ward
Rob Dunn is an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, focusing on the biodiversity of humans. He is a professor in the Department of Applied Ecology at North Carolina State University and in the Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics at the University of Copenhagen. The author of several books, his latest is A Natural History of the Future.

Why Science?

I love science and I love art and I love them for the same reason. Both struggle to lay hold of deep truths about the world and the story of humans relative to those truths. I've been a scientist for a couple decades or more, depending on when you start counting, but the potential to work with other people to understand things no one has ever understood before remains as raw and thrilling as it has ever been. It is lightning. So too the feeling before the discovery that one might be on to something. 'What if,' the conversation in the laboratory begins. 'What if...'

Why this book?

If you watch the news, it is easy to become convinced that the future is purely technological. Either we will all live either live in bubbles on other planets (see for example the rate at which the rockets of billionaires are being flung upward) or we will live in a metaverse, connected via the Internet and disconnected from the worlds around us. As an ecologist, it is obvious that what is missing from this story is the living world.

If we go to space, we will still be subject to the rules of life. So too if we move permanently indoors. Yet, in discussions about the future, the story of the living world is quiet. An afterthought. A potted plant in a bubble. I wanted to tell the stories of the ways in which the rules of life will continue to influence humanity. But also, I wanted to make clear that we have overestimated our own power. The rugged processes of nature are far more powerful and lasting than is humanity itself. Long after we are gone those processes will continue. That seemed to me like a story that was missing, so I wanted to tell it in this book.

What’s next?

Bookwise, I'm not sure. I'm in the phase when I'm just reading a lot and thinking and talking and then reading some more.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I'm really excited about working with visual artists and fiction writers to think about new ways to imagine the future. The scenarios that scientists think about tend to be very focused on, say, climate or human population sizes. They tend to say very little about the ways in which humans live on a daily basis. Artists and writers have been more creative. So why don't we pull artists, writers and scientists (and other scholars) to think together about diverse kinds of planetary scenarios. I think creating these scenarios may well be very important. It is very hard to work toward a future that you haven't yet envisioned.

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog