Skip to main content

The Science of Sci-Fi Music - Andrew May ****

If you had to write a description of the target audience for this book - interested in science, science fiction and serious music - I am such a perfect match that I confess my rating of it may be slightly inflated. Andrew May takes on the whole gamut of the interaction between science fiction and music, from the use of music in science fiction films to the influence of science on music which gave it a 'sci-fi' feel. Along the way we get a whole host of revelations, and though May makes it clear that there will be very limited consideration of the theory of music itself, even there for many there will be discoveries.

 We begin with 'alien sounds' - what makes music sound in some way alien or spacey. This mixes musical ideas and the move away from classical techniques in serious composing. From the 1950s, music for science fiction movies had a tendency to look to both electronics (for example in the downright weird soundtrack of the classic Forbidden Planet) to using much more modern sounds and musical structures than those of the largely lush romantics that typically influenced other film music of the period. Although not science fiction, I was delighted Scott Bradley's music for Tom and Jerry got a mention - if you listen to the soundtrack of these cartoons they are pure twentieth century serious music in style, though they most resemble Stravinsky (one of my favourite composers, and one who May sadly doesn't really bring into the discussion). 

 We also see in this and later chapters some of the key electronic instruments including the theremin and Moog's synthesisers, though I would have liked to have known a little more about how the bespoke circuits used by some of the early SF film composers worked. Inevitably and importantly we hear about the stunning use of Ligeti's music in 2001, A Space Odyssey - one of May's fascinating revelations is that this was done without Ligeti being aware of it.

 We then move onto the interaction of maths and music. As May points out, this has always been the case, whether used explicitly, or implicitly through the 'rules' that composers were taught (and the best composers broke) - but in the twentieth century, with concepts such as 12 tone, serialism and aleatoric (randomly selected) music, these principles came more explicitly to the fore. This is followed by an exploration of electronics in music, from the earliest hand-built circuits, through Moog to modern digital electronics. This is not just for the inherently 'scientific' aspect of the construction, but also because electronic music continues to be something we associate with the science fiction theme.

 We then get onto music based on science, which May points out is often pseudo-scientific, either making use of scientific concepts in a way totally unrelated to the science itself or trying to provide some kind of bridge between science and the arts, which tends to be beloved of funding bodies but has very little benefit for either the sciences or good music. Finally we explore the relationship of science fiction and musical culture, from SF-inspired music to the representation of future music in science fiction stories.

 The weakest aspect of the book is its structure. As the linking theme is relatively tenuous it tends to jump around - the sections overlap too much, and present the reader with collections of facts without much of a continuous narrative. Occasionally the writer's personal enthusiasms are allowed a little too much exposure - there seemed far too much on writer Philip K. Dick's work, for example. And if you are familiar with music, May's approach of using numerical MIDI-style representation of notes and chords tended to obscure rather than help. But these are all relatively minor points.

 If either the development of electronic music and avant garde musical techniques or science fiction is an interest, this book is likely to pique your attention. If both interest you, this is a book that has to be added to your collection.

 The author has produced a short video that pulls together the themes of the book:



Paperback:    
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more