Skip to main content

The Science of Sci-Fi Music - Andrew May ****

If you had to write a description of the target audience for this book - interested in science, science fiction and serious music - I am such a perfect match that I confess my rating of it may be slightly inflated. Andrew May takes on the whole gamut of the interaction between science fiction and music, from the use of music in science fiction films to the influence of science on music which gave it a 'sci-fi' feel. Along the way we get a whole host of revelations, and though May makes it clear that there will be very limited consideration of the theory of music itself, even there for many there will be discoveries.

We begin with 'alien sounds' - what makes music sound in some way alien or spacey. This mixes musical ideas and the move away from classical techniques in serious composing. From the 1950s, music for science fiction movies had a tendency to look to both electronics (for example in the downright weird soundtrack of the classic Forbidden Planet) to using much more modern sounds and musical structures than those of the largely lush romantics that typically influenced other film music of the period. Although not science fiction, I was delighted Scott Bradley's music for Tom and Jerry got a mention - if you listen to the soundtrack of these cartoons they are pure twentieth century serious music in style, though they most resemble Stravinsky (one of my favourite composers, and one who May sadly doesn't really bring into the discussion). 

We also see in this and later chapters some of the key electronic instruments including the theremin and Moog's synthesisers, though I would have liked to have known a little more about how the bespoke circuits used by some of the early SF film composers worked. Inevitably and importantly we hear about the stunning use of Ligeti's music in 2001, A Space Odyssey - one of May's fascinating revelations is that this was done without Ligeti being aware of it.

We then move onto the interaction of maths and music. As May points out, this has always been the case, whether used explicitly, or implicitly through the 'rules' that composers were taught (and the best composers broke) - but in the twentieth century, with concepts such as 12 tone, serialism and aleatoric (randomly selected) music, these principles came more explicitly to the fore. This is followed by an exploration of electronics in music, from the earliest hand-built circuits, through Moog to modern digital electronics. This is not just for the inherently 'scientific' aspect of the construction, but also because electronic music continues to be something we associate with the science fiction theme.

We then get onto music based on science, which May points out is often pseudo-scientific, either making use of scientific concepts in a way totally unrelated to the science itself or trying to provide some kind of bridge between science and the arts, which tends to be beloved of funding bodies but has very little benefit for either the sciences or good music. Finally we explore the relationship of science fiction and musical culture, from SF-inspired music to the representation of future music in science fiction stories.

The weakest aspect of the book is its structure. As the linking theme is relatively tenuous it tends to jump around - the sections overlap too much, and present the reader with collections of facts without much of a continuous narrative. Occasionally the writer's personal enthusiasms are allowed a little too much exposure - there seemed far too much on writer Philip K. Dick's work, for example. And if you are familiar with music, May's approach of using numerical MIDI-style representation of notes and chords tended to obscure rather than help. But these are all relatively minor points.

If either the development of electronic music and avant garde musical techniques or science fiction is an interest, this book is likely to pique your attention. If both interest you, this is a book that has to be added to your collection.

The author has produced a short video that pulls together the themes of the book:





Paperback:    
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

Ctrl+Alt+Chaos - Joe Tidy ****

Anyone like me with a background in programming is likely to be fascinated (if horrified) by books that present stories of hacking and other destructive work mostly by young males, some of whom have remarkable abilities with code, but use it for unpleasant purposes. I remember reading Clifford Stoll's 1990 book The Cuckoo's Egg about the first ever network worm (the 1988 ARPANet worm, which accidentally did more damage than was intended) - the book is so engraved in my mind I could still remember who the author was decades later. This is very much in the same vein,  but brings the story into the true internet age. Joe Tidy gives us real insights into the often-teen hacking gangs, many with members from the US and UK, who have caused online chaos and real harm. These attacks seem to have mostly started as pranks, but have moved into financial extortion and attempts to destroy others' lives through doxing, swatting (sending false messages to the police resulting in a SWAT te...