Skip to main content

Pocket Einstein: 10 Short Lessons in Space Travel - Paul Parsons ****

This handsome little hardback manages to pack a surprising amount of information into the '10 short lessons' that are its chapters. Paul Parsons lucidly and engagingly takes us through the history and future of space travel. The prime focus is on human travel, though there's reasonable coverage of unmanned satellites and missions which, in practical terms have contributed far more both scientifically and usefully than manned missions.

 Inevitably, Parsons brings up the big players of space history - the early days of the space race, Apollo, the International Space Station, the move towards more commercial players being involved - but  there is also the opportunity to explore the essentials of space travel, such as the physics of leaving the planet and the considerations of practical rocketry, space survival, the business possibilities and even the chances of reaching the stars. Here there is some brief exploration of some of the more science fictional aspects such as wormholes and warp drives, but also the far more realistic possibilities, for example of the Breakthrough Starshot project to send a flotilla of tiny spacecraft to Proxima Centauri at a reasonable fraction of the speed of light.

 There is something here for both the beginner and the seasoned spaceflight enthusiast, all condensed into short chapters than are easy to consume on a commute or in a spare half hour. As someone who watched the Moon landing live, I have never lost the sense of wonder inspired by this remarkable undertaking, and Parsons manages to put this across well, while still underlining the many difficulties and limitations placed on human beings by the inhospitable environment of space. The book is enthusiastic without ever being a Pollyanna-like exposition that forgets just how hard the whole business of getting into space and surviving there is.

 Any limitations the book has are primarily down to the format. The short lessons are easily digested, but being quite short do limit the content to mostly putting facts across without leaving room much storytelling. I personally find most of the additional features, such as the boxes (which I tend not to read) and the glossary (if technical terms aren't explained as you go they shouldn't be in the text) an unnecessary distraction. But the format - particularly the bite-sized chunks of the 10 lessons -  is probably part of what makes this an attractive book for many readers, so it has to be lived with. One other personal dislike is the use of the second person, which is done at the start of a couple of chapters (e.g. 'The feeling of anxiety in the pit of your stomach has grown close to nausea...' at the opening of the first lesson) - but it's not overdone.

 Overall, an interesting and lively overview of space travel that should be enjoyed by many readers, both teenagers new to the topic and older readers who want to get a better handle on the topic.
Hardback:    
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more