Skip to main content

Pocket Einstein: 10 Short Lessons in Space Travel - Paul Parsons ****

This handsome little hardback manages to pack a surprising amount of information into the '10 short lessons' that are its chapters. Paul Parsons lucidly and engagingly takes us through the history and future of space travel. The prime focus is on human travel, though there's reasonable coverage of unmanned satellites and missions which, in practical terms have contributed far more both scientifically and usefully than manned missions.

 Inevitably, Parsons brings up the big players of space history - the early days of the space race, Apollo, the International Space Station, the move towards more commercial players being involved - but  there is also the opportunity to explore the essentials of space travel, such as the physics of leaving the planet and the considerations of practical rocketry, space survival, the business possibilities and even the chances of reaching the stars. Here there is some brief exploration of some of the more science fictional aspects such as wormholes and warp drives, but also the far more realistic possibilities, for example of the Breakthrough Starshot project to send a flotilla of tiny spacecraft to Proxima Centauri at a reasonable fraction of the speed of light.

 There is something here for both the beginner and the seasoned spaceflight enthusiast, all condensed into short chapters than are easy to consume on a commute or in a spare half hour. As someone who watched the Moon landing live, I have never lost the sense of wonder inspired by this remarkable undertaking, and Parsons manages to put this across well, while still underlining the many difficulties and limitations placed on human beings by the inhospitable environment of space. The book is enthusiastic without ever being a Pollyanna-like exposition that forgets just how hard the whole business of getting into space and surviving there is.

 Any limitations the book has are primarily down to the format. The short lessons are easily digested, but being quite short do limit the content to mostly putting facts across without leaving room much storytelling. I personally find most of the additional features, such as the boxes (which I tend not to read) and the glossary (if technical terms aren't explained as you go they shouldn't be in the text) an unnecessary distraction. But the format - particularly the bite-sized chunks of the 10 lessons -  is probably part of what makes this an attractive book for many readers, so it has to be lived with. One other personal dislike is the use of the second person, which is done at the start of a couple of chapters (e.g. 'The feeling of anxiety in the pit of your stomach has grown close to nausea...' at the opening of the first lesson) - but it's not overdone.

 Overall, an interesting and lively overview of space travel that should be enjoyed by many readers, both teenagers new to the topic and older readers who want to get a better handle on the topic.
Hardback:    
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more