Skip to main content

Disaster by Choice - Ilan Kelman ***

At the heart of Ilan Kelman's book is a striking claim - 'natural' disasters don't really exist. Instead, it's suggested, there are natural hazards and we choose by our actions (or often inactions) whether or not to turn these into disasters.

The book starts really well with a gripping description of the Haiti earthquake and its aftermath. Kelman makes a good job of telling the story and using it to powerful effect. He goes on to effectively describe some of the possible natural hazards that can lead to disasters, this time focusing his story on the mundane-seeming protection of Canvey Island from the Thames and on Australian bushfires (in a book written before 2019's devastating fires). We see how a combination of economics, politics and the human ability to not think to clearly about the future encourages a repeated failure to learn the lessons of past events.

This is no cold, scientific assessment - Kelman does not prevent emotional language from entering his arguments. And that's fine. But about half way through the book, things seem to get rather bogged down. By now we have a good understanding of why some individuals and communities are better prepared than others, but then we first get a rather odd deviation in a discussion of gender and identity politics before the book moves on to solutions - perhaps because they are so difficult, at this stage Kelman seems to lose momentum and flounders about a little. We get yet more examples, where we've had enough of these and want to get on to the practicalities. And the approach to fixing things seems to be just to say 'we all have responsibilities', which isn't a great way to make anything happen.

A book of two halves, then. A great opening deserving of at least four stars - and the idea that we bring disasters on ourselves rather than nature imposing them is a powerful one - but as a book, Disaster by Choice loses its impetus part way through.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

  1. Ilan Kelman1 March 2020 at 05:57

    A dozen scientific citations on the importance of gender and identity politics for dealing with disasters:
    1. Ahmad, A. 2018. Conceptualizing Disasters from a Gender Perspective. Pages 105-117 in D. O’Mathúna, V. Dranseika, and B. Gordijn, eds., Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories, Springer, Cham.
    2. Buckingham, S. and V. Le Masson. 2017. Understanding Climate Change through Gender Relations. Routledge, Abingdon.
    3. Cupples, J. 2007. Gender and Hurricane Mitch: reconstructing subjectivities after disaster. Disasters, 31, 2, 155-175.
    4. Enarson, E. and P.G.D. Chakrabarti, eds. 2009. Women, Gender and Disaster: Global Issues and Initiatives. Sage, London.
    5. Enarson, E. and B.H. Morrow, eds. 1998. The gendered terrain of disaster: through women’s eyes. Greenwood Publications, Connecticut.
    6. Enarson, E. and B. Pease. 2016. Men, Masculinities and Disaster. Routledge, Abingdon.
    7. Fordham, M. 1999. The intersection of gender and social class in disaster: Balancing resilience and vulnerability. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17, 1, 15-36.
    8. Fordham M. 1999. Participatory planning for flood mitigation: models and approaches. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13, 27-34.
    9. Fothergill, A. 1996. Gender, Risk, and Disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. Disasters, 14, 1, 33-56.
    10. Gaillard, JC, K. Sanz, B.C. Balgos, S.N.M. Dalisay, A. Gorman-Murray, F. Smith, and V. Toelupe. 2017. Beyond men and women: A critical perspective on gender and disaster. Disasters, 41, 3, 429-447.
    11. Gaillard, JC, A. Gorman-Murray, and M. Fordham. 2017. Sexual and gender minorities in disaster. Gender, Place and Culture, 24, 1, 18-26.
    12. Kinnvall, C. and H. Rydstrom. 2019. Climate Hazards, Disasters, and Gender Ramifications. Routledge, Abingdon.
    There are plenty more references, if they would be of interest? A direct and practical solution to gender-based vulnerabilities is to implement the specific advice and recommendations detailed in this science. For other forms of practicalities and solutions, see the book's text on the actions taken by Marcos Eduardo Barquero Varela and the people of Colorado, Nowapara, Pashurbunia, Seattle, Singas, and Toronto.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more