Skip to main content

Disaster by Choice - Ilan Kelman ***

At the heart of Ilan Kelman's book is a striking claim - 'natural' disasters don't really exist. Instead, it's suggested, there are natural hazards and we choose by our actions (or often inactions) whether or not to turn these into disasters.

The book starts really well with a gripping description of the Haiti earthquake and its aftermath. Kelman makes a good job of telling the story and using it to powerful effect. He goes on to effectively describe some of the possible natural hazards that can lead to disasters, this time focusing his story on the mundane-seeming protection of Canvey Island from the Thames and on Australian bushfires (in a book written before 2019's devastating fires). We see how a combination of economics, politics and the human ability to not think to clearly about the future encourages a repeated failure to learn the lessons of past events.

This is no cold, scientific assessment - Kelman does not prevent emotional language from entering his arguments. And that's fine. But about half way through the book, things seem to get rather bogged down. By now we have a good understanding of why some individuals and communities are better prepared than others, but then we first get a rather odd deviation in a discussion of gender and identity politics before the book moves on to solutions - perhaps because they are so difficult, at this stage Kelman seems to lose momentum and flounders about a little. We get yet more examples, where we've had enough of these and want to get on to the practicalities. And the approach to fixing things seems to be just to say 'we all have responsibilities', which isn't a great way to make anything happen.

A book of two halves, then. A great opening deserving of at least four stars - and the idea that we bring disasters on ourselves rather than nature imposing them is a powerful one - but as a book, Disaster by Choice loses its impetus part way through.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

  1. Ilan Kelman1 March 2020 at 05:57

    A dozen scientific citations on the importance of gender and identity politics for dealing with disasters:
    1. Ahmad, A. 2018. Conceptualizing Disasters from a Gender Perspective. Pages 105-117 in D. O’Mathúna, V. Dranseika, and B. Gordijn, eds., Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories, Springer, Cham.
    2. Buckingham, S. and V. Le Masson. 2017. Understanding Climate Change through Gender Relations. Routledge, Abingdon.
    3. Cupples, J. 2007. Gender and Hurricane Mitch: reconstructing subjectivities after disaster. Disasters, 31, 2, 155-175.
    4. Enarson, E. and P.G.D. Chakrabarti, eds. 2009. Women, Gender and Disaster: Global Issues and Initiatives. Sage, London.
    5. Enarson, E. and B.H. Morrow, eds. 1998. The gendered terrain of disaster: through women’s eyes. Greenwood Publications, Connecticut.
    6. Enarson, E. and B. Pease. 2016. Men, Masculinities and Disaster. Routledge, Abingdon.
    7. Fordham, M. 1999. The intersection of gender and social class in disaster: Balancing resilience and vulnerability. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17, 1, 15-36.
    8. Fordham M. 1999. Participatory planning for flood mitigation: models and approaches. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13, 27-34.
    9. Fothergill, A. 1996. Gender, Risk, and Disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. Disasters, 14, 1, 33-56.
    10. Gaillard, JC, K. Sanz, B.C. Balgos, S.N.M. Dalisay, A. Gorman-Murray, F. Smith, and V. Toelupe. 2017. Beyond men and women: A critical perspective on gender and disaster. Disasters, 41, 3, 429-447.
    11. Gaillard, JC, A. Gorman-Murray, and M. Fordham. 2017. Sexual and gender minorities in disaster. Gender, Place and Culture, 24, 1, 18-26.
    12. Kinnvall, C. and H. Rydstrom. 2019. Climate Hazards, Disasters, and Gender Ramifications. Routledge, Abingdon.
    There are plenty more references, if they would be of interest? A direct and practical solution to gender-based vulnerabilities is to implement the specific advice and recommendations detailed in this science. For other forms of practicalities and solutions, see the book's text on the actions taken by Marcos Eduardo Barquero Varela and the people of Colorado, Nowapara, Pashurbunia, Seattle, Singas, and Toronto.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more