Skip to main content

How Smart Machines Think - Sean Gerrish ****

While it will become apparent I think this book should have been titled 'How Dumb Machines Think', it was a remarkably enjoyable insight into how the well publicised AI successes - self-driving cars, image and face recognition, IBM's Jeopardy! playing Watson, along with  game playing AIs in chess, Go and Atari and StarCraft, perform their dark arts.

 There's no actual programming presented here, so no need for non-programmers to panic, though there is some quite detailed discussion of how the software architectures are structured and how the different components - for example neural networks - do their job, but it isn't anything too scary if you take it slowly.

 One thing that comes across very strongly, despite the AI types' insistence that their programs are of general use, is how very specifically tailored programs like the AlphaGo software that beat champions at the game Go, and the Watson computer that won at the US TV quiz show Jeopardy! were - incredibly finely designed to meet use and that use only.

 The reason I make the remark about dumb machines is that what doesn't come across sufficiently in Sean Gerrish's book is that, because these programs are not in any sense intelligent, when they get things wrong, they often get things dramatically wrong. So some of Watson's answers on Jeopardy! did not make any sense at all. Similarly, image recognition software can be fooled by apparently abstract patterns that happen to have the right components to appear to be a distinguishable object. And when you bear in mind we're suggesting putting this kind of software in charge of cars that 'getting it dramatically wrong' bit is more than a little unnerving.

 There was, though, a great section on the development of self-driving cars, from the original feeble attempts, where all the competitors in a race failed before completing 10 percent of the course, through to more recent and more successful versions that can handle basic traffic scenarios - though it would have been nice if Gerrish had gone beyond the old prize challenges to describe what the latest Google and Uber vehicles do. (It may be that their approaches are too proprietary.)

 However, what was missing was any serious assessment of the big problems still faced. There have been two excellent books recently on the huge holes in AI that practitioners rarely admit to - The AI Delusion and Common Sense, The Turing Test and the Quest for Real AI - Gerrish would have produced an even better book if he could have addressed the concerns that these books raise.

 Even so, in How Smart Machines Think we have a hugely informative and very readable book for anyone with an interest in finding out just what the much-trumpeted AI systems really do, and what lies beneath the hype.

Hardback:  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more