Serendipity - Telmo Pievani (trans. Michael Gerard Kenyon) ***

There is no doubt that serendipity is a delightful word - and equally no doubt that its meaning of making accidental positive discoveries is an apt one for science. It's quite fun to hear about unexpected finds, whether it's the famous ones like penicillin or perhaps less well known discoveries from PTFE to saccharin (neither of which are considered here).

It is, however, a rather delicate concept - not suited to a heavy duty approach, which is arguably what Telmo Pievani gives it in this slim (but surprisingly long feeling) book. A non-fiction writer is always faced with the temptation to give far more detail on a topic that interests them than necessarily engages their readers. Here, Pievani goes to town on the origins of the word 'serendipity'. It is, indeed vaguely interesting that it came from an old tale about the 'Three Princes of Serendip', but the level of detail we're given on the ancient Persian set of stories this originates from verges on the excruciating - about 20 pages dedicated to little more than etymology, and getting on for 50 pages of meandering before we touch much science.

We do get some scientific discoveries to justify the subtitle of 'the unexpected in science' - but even here it's arguable whether some of the discoveries, such as pulsars really could be considered serendipity. It's true that they were not looking for pulsars (how could they, when no one knew they existed), but they were looking - Bell's discovery was not an accident in the conventional sense of the word. When we do hit on true serendipity, the storytelling is sparse, often getting through it in a page or so before getting back to meandering.

I'm sure this book will appeal to some readers, but I found it verging on the pompous and rarely interesting.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge Introducing … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as … for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily, Introducing Artificial Intelligence is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

Search This Blog