Serendipity - Telmo Pievani (trans. Michael Gerard Kenyon) ***

There is no doubt that serendipity is a delightful word - and equally no doubt that its meaning of making accidental positive discoveries is an apt one for science. It's quite fun to hear about unexpected finds, whether it's the famous ones like penicillin or perhaps less well known discoveries from PTFE to saccharin (neither of which are considered here).

It is, however, a rather delicate concept - not suited to a heavy duty approach, which is arguably what Telmo Pievani gives it in this slim (but surprisingly long feeling) book. A non-fiction writer is always faced with the temptation to give far more detail on a topic that interests them than necessarily engages their readers. Here, Pievani goes to town on the origins of the word 'serendipity'. It is, indeed vaguely interesting that it came from an old tale about the 'Three Princes of Serendip', but the level of detail we're given on the ancient Persian set of stories this originates from verges on the excruciating - about 20 pages dedicated to little more than etymology, and getting on for 50 pages of meandering before we touch much science.

We do get some scientific discoveries to justify the subtitle of 'the unexpected in science' - but even here it's arguable whether some of the discoveries, such as pulsars really could be considered serendipity. It's true that they were not looking for pulsars (how could they, when no one knew they existed), but they were looking - Bell's discovery was not an accident in the conventional sense of the word. When we do hit on true serendipity, the storytelling is sparse, often getting through it in a page or so before getting back to meandering.

I'm sure this book will appeal to some readers, but I found it verging on the pompous and rarely interesting.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin Five Way Interview

Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin (born in 1999) is a distinguished composer, concert pianist, music theorist and researcher. Three of his piano CDs have been released in Germany. He started his undergraduate degree at the age of 13 in Kazakhstan, and having completed three musical doctorates in prominent Italian music institutions at the age of 20, he has mastered advanced composition techniques. In 2024 he completed a PhD in music at the University of St Andrews / Royal Conservatoire of Scotland (researching timbre-texture co-ordinate in avant- garde music), and was awarded The Silver Medal of The Worshipful Company of Musicians, London. He has held visiting affiliations at the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge and UCL, and has been lecturing and giving talks internationally since the age of 13. His latest book is Quantum Mechanics and Avant Garde Music . What links quantum physics and avant-garde music? The entire book is devoted to this question. To put it briefly, there are many different link...

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on...

Should we question science?

I was surprised recently by something Simon Singh put on X about Sabine Hossenfelder. I have huge admiration for Simon, but I also have a lot of respect for Sabine. She has written two excellent books and has been helpful to me with a number of physics queries - she also had a really interesting blog, and has now become particularly successful with her science videos. This is where I'm afraid she lost me as audience, as I find video a very unsatisfactory medium to take in information - but I know it has mass appeal. This meant I was concerned by Simon's tweet (or whatever we are supposed to call posts on X) saying 'The Problem With Sabine Hossenfelder: if you are a fan of SH... then this is worth watching.' He was referencing a video from 'Professor Dave Explains' - I'm not familiar with Professor Dave (aka Dave Farina, who apparently isn't a professor, which is perhaps a bit unfortunate for someone calling out fakes), but his videos are popular and he...

Search This Blog