Skip to main content

Ben Orlin - Five Way Interview

Ben Orlin loves math and cannot draw. He is the author of several bestselling books: Math with Bad Drawings (2018), the calculus storybook Change is the Only Constant (2019) and the infamously large Math Games with Bad Drawings (2022). He has taught every level of mathematics from 6th grade to undergraduate, and his work has appeared in The Atlantic, The Los Angeles Times, and Popular Science. His latest book is Math for English Majors.

Why math(s)?

My first passion is how people think. (Before I was a math major, I was a psych major!) So I view math, and especially math education, as a magnificent case study in applied psychology.

How do we braid together intuition and logic? How do we move from concrete details to abstract truths? What makes us build identities as 'a math person' or 'not a math person'? Every student I've ever taught had their own irreducible, irreproducible way of thinking about math. Nothing excites me more than learning how students think.

Why this book?

When I talk to mathematicians, they all downplay mathematical language. 'It's about the ideas,' they say, 'not the symbols.' Which is true enough!

But when I talk to writers, they love language. They've got favorite words, accents, etymologies, regional idioms... for them, the language is the raw material of literature, and it's fun to play with.

I wanted to bring that linguistic curiosity to math. Too often, the rules of our language remain invisible -- unspeakably obvious to experts, but unimaginably foreign to novices. This book is aiming to help both experts and novices see the language with new eyes.

Do you think if we were to redesign the language of mathematics from scratch, rather than the piecemeal form it now takes, it would be very different (and if so, how)?

Ooh, that's like pondering how evolution might unfold on an alien planet. The possibilities must be vast, but my imagination falters!

Maybe, freed from the strictures of typesetting, we'd design something more two-dimensional, like the triangle of power (which unifies logs, roots, and exponents) or the alien symbols in Arrival. Or maybe, because we perceive colors so vividly, we'd use them to carry meanings, like in Oliver Byrne's illustrated version of Euclid.

Still, I can only see mathematics through the window of our language. I struggle to envision what it'd look like from another vantage point!

What’s next?

This is my fourth book, and I'm excited to keep writing them. Several ideas are in competition for the next one:

1. A collection of the finest brain teasers that ever teased brains

2. A pilgrimage in search of mathematical beauty

3. True folktales of heroic calculations

4. Life wisdom from a probability-obsessed father (specifically, my father)

I invite readers to weigh in on the options! I am so suggestible and easily swayed that with sufficient pestering and flattery you can probably get me to write a book of your choice.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

My eldest is starting kindergarten; my youngest is starting to say her sister's name; I'm designing a new class on financial and civic mathematics; and less than 24 hours after typing these words, I'll be at the Minnesota State Fair eating grilled corn. In short: exciting times!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more