Skip to main content

Stephen Hawking: Genius at Work - Roger Highfield ****

It is easy to suspect that a biographical book from highly-illustrated publisher Dorling Kindersley would be mostly high level fluff, so I was pleasantly surprised at the depth Roger Highfield has worked into this large-format title. Yes, we get some of the ephemera so beloved of such books, such as a whole page dedicated to Hawking's coxing blazer - but there is plenty on Hawking's scientific life and particularly on his many scientific ideas. I've read a couple of biographies of Hawking, but I still came across aspects of his lesser fields here that I didn't remember, as well as the inevitable topics, ranging from Hawking radiation to his attempts to quell the out-of-control nature of the possible string theory universes.

We also get plenty of coverage of what could be classified as Hawking the celebrity, whether it be a photograph with the Obamas in the White House, his appearances on Star Trek TNG and The Big Bang Theory or representations of him in the Simpsons. Hawking's celebrity is a fascinating social science phenomenon (in fact, it's a shame that isn't explored more.) And there's a pleasant undercurrent of Hawking trivia, whether it be artistic representations of the man, his interest in Marilyn Monroe or musical tastes.  All in all it is a highly entertaining and informative Stephen Hawking cornucopia.

I do have two concerns, one specific about this the book, and the other about a pair of cultural parallels that frequently occur when writing about Hawking. Highfield is steeped in the nature of London's Science Museum, and the structure of the book is more like that of a museum or art gallery than a conventional written document. Rather than get any sense of chronological development, or structure by scientific topic, the book jumps around from section to section as if we are walking from gallery to gallery, where particular artefacts and concepts are put into context in the approach beloved of trendy curators. I would have preferred a more book-like format.

As far as the cultural parallels, one is the medieval saint. We are told, for example, of a detailed scan of Hawking's office to 'preserve it in digital form so that it can be explored by online audiences'. This feels very like the careful preservation of saintly relics. The other parallel I felt was with Joseph Merrick. By repute, he was an interesting conversationalist - but his deformities defined him for the vast majority. There is no doubt that Hawking's story is inspiring - it is entirely remarkable that he was able to do so much work in mathematical physics while suffering from such a debilitating disease, yet it was this ability to overcome his condition and not his work itself that drives worldwide interest in him. Probably only Newton, Einstein and perhaps Marie Curie are in the same league of fame - yet they (and many other scientists) arguably achieved far more than Hawking did - and I would have liked to have seen a little more balance in putting his achievements into perspective.

That does not, however, take away the value of this book: it does very effectively document a phenomenon, and can provide a wide appeal because it dips into many aspects of his work for those who are interested in the science while also exploring (if not criticising) the more celebrity-framed aspects of his life. It reaches the parts that most heavily illustrated books never do, and that should be applauded.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...