Skip to main content

The Spirit of Mathematics - David Acheson ****

The subtitle of this slim book is 'algebra and all that', presumably in reference to David Acheson's impressively entertaining general mathematics title, 1089 and all that (itself, a reference to 1066 and all that). What Acheson managed with that book was almost inconceivable - an educational book about maths that was genuinely fun to read.

Clearly, the aim here is to take the same approach with a specific focus on algebra, though the book does stray into geometry and one or two other fields occasionally. And the result is again a delight. It feels a little like an old children's book for adults, with a deliberately old-fashioned style, delighting, for example, in giving examples from ancient textbooks. Acheson makes use of illustrations, cartoons, and occasional two page spreads such as 'Playing with infinity' to break up the material, but this is definitely for an older teen/adult audience.

The underlying message is that the book is attempting to 'capture the spirit of mathematics using only simple materials'. This certainly isn't a purely descriptive history of maths book, as there's plenty of actually mathematical content. 'Simple materials' means that there's nothing here that someone with the basic maths taught to, say, the age of 16 would find difficult. What Acheson does well is to bring out why mathematicians love the subject and some of the tricks of the trade and ways of looking at things that may be different from that of normal folk.

One thing I'm not sure Acheson does entirely address is an implication of his comment 'so far as I can determine, the mystery [of algebra] can often be summed up in one simple question: what is algebra really for?' He points out that the power of algebra is in expressing general statements and ideas in mathematics. The book does show this, but I don't think the question is quite right. Most people, I'd suggest think rather 'What use is algebra to me in everyday life?' and the examples here (including the infamous bath filling problems) don't really address that for fairly obvious reasons. It might, then, have been helpful to also more explicitly demonstrate the indirect lessons we get from that ability to express general statements and ideas. I loved algebra at school as puzzle solving, but I know many people do struggle to see the point.

In practice, this probably isn't much of an issue as the people who are going to buy this book are likely to be in my 'algebra is fun puzzle solving' camp. I really enjoyed reading it, though I wasn't quite as enamoured as I was with its predecessor. However, there's lots of fun stuff, with plenty of links back to the history of maths, some educational material and some practical mathematical tools, so it's still a strong recommendation for the mathematical bookshelf.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more