Skip to main content

The Spirit of Mathematics - David Acheson ****

The subtitle of this slim book is 'algebra and all that', presumably in reference to David Acheson's impressively entertaining general mathematics title, 1089 and all that (itself, a reference to 1066 and all that). What Acheson managed with that book was almost inconceivable - an educational book about maths that was genuinely fun to read.

Clearly, the aim here is to take the same approach with a specific focus on algebra, though the book does stray into geometry and one or two other fields occasionally. And the result is again a delight. It feels a little like an old children's book for adults, with a deliberately old-fashioned style, delighting, for example, in giving examples from ancient textbooks. Acheson makes use of illustrations, cartoons, and occasional two page spreads such as 'Playing with infinity' to break up the material, but this is definitely for an older teen/adult audience.

The underlying message is that the book is attempting to 'capture the spirit of mathematics using only simple materials'. This certainly isn't a purely descriptive history of maths book, as there's plenty of actually mathematical content. 'Simple materials' means that there's nothing here that someone with the basic maths taught to, say, the age of 16 would find difficult. What Acheson does well is to bring out why mathematicians love the subject and some of the tricks of the trade and ways of looking at things that may be different from that of normal folk.

One thing I'm not sure Acheson does entirely address is an implication of his comment 'so far as I can determine, the mystery [of algebra] can often be summed up in one simple question: what is algebra really for?' He points out that the power of algebra is in expressing general statements and ideas in mathematics. The book does show this, but I don't think the question is quite right. Most people, I'd suggest think rather 'What use is algebra to me in everyday life?' and the examples here (including the infamous bath filling problems) don't really address that for fairly obvious reasons. It might, then, have been helpful to also more explicitly demonstrate the indirect lessons we get from that ability to express general statements and ideas. I loved algebra at school as puzzle solving, but I know many people do struggle to see the point.

In practice, this probably isn't much of an issue as the people who are going to buy this book are likely to be in my 'algebra is fun puzzle solving' camp. I really enjoyed reading it, though I wasn't quite as enamoured as I was with its predecessor. However, there's lots of fun stuff, with plenty of links back to the history of maths, some educational material and some practical mathematical tools, so it's still a strong recommendation for the mathematical bookshelf.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more