Skip to main content

The Spirit of Mathematics - David Acheson ****

The subtitle of this slim book is 'algebra and all that', presumably in reference to David Acheson's impressively entertaining general mathematics title, 1089 and all that (itself, a reference to 1066 and all that). What Acheson managed with that book was almost inconceivable - an educational book about maths that was genuinely fun to read.

Clearly, the aim here is to take the same approach with a specific focus on algebra, though the book does stray into geometry and one or two other fields occasionally. And the result is again a delight. It feels a little like an old children's book for adults, with a deliberately old-fashioned style, delighting, for example, in giving examples from ancient textbooks. Acheson makes use of illustrations, cartoons, and occasional two page spreads such as 'Playing with infinity' to break up the material, but this is definitely for an older teen/adult audience.

The underlying message is that the book is attempting to 'capture the spirit of mathematics using only simple materials'. This certainly isn't a purely descriptive history of maths book, as there's plenty of actually mathematical content. 'Simple materials' means that there's nothing here that someone with the basic maths taught to, say, the age of 16 would find difficult. What Acheson does well is to bring out why mathematicians love the subject and some of the tricks of the trade and ways of looking at things that may be different from that of normal folk.

One thing I'm not sure Acheson does entirely address is an implication of his comment 'so far as I can determine, the mystery [of algebra] can often be summed up in one simple question: what is algebra really for?' He points out that the power of algebra is in expressing general statements and ideas in mathematics. The book does show this, but I don't think the question is quite right. Most people, I'd suggest think rather 'What use is algebra to me in everyday life?' and the examples here (including the infamous bath filling problems) don't really address that for fairly obvious reasons. It might, then, have been helpful to also more explicitly demonstrate the indirect lessons we get from that ability to express general statements and ideas. I loved algebra at school as puzzle solving, but I know many people do struggle to see the point.

In practice, this probably isn't much of an issue as the people who are going to buy this book are likely to be in my 'algebra is fun puzzle solving' camp. I really enjoyed reading it, though I wasn't quite as enamoured as I was with its predecessor. However, there's lots of fun stuff, with plenty of links back to the history of maths, some educational material and some practical mathematical tools, so it's still a strong recommendation for the mathematical bookshelf.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more