Skip to main content

Seasonal review 2022

Image from Unsplash
There may not be any reviews here now until January 2023 as we like to take a break - but our reviews will be back again in January.

Topics come and go in the popular science world - looking back over 2022, brains/consciousness, climate change, AI and space/cosmology have been the most dominant in terms of review titles. As someone with a particular interest in physics and maths, I'd love to see a few more of those next year. And chemistry remains the least covered of the core science subjects. 

A few years ago I speculated on why this was the case. Back then (2017) this site had 22 books under 'chemistry' as opposed to 97 maths, 126 biology and 182 physics. Admittedly, there is always a danger of editorial bias, but I have certainly never avoided chemistry titles if publishers sent them my way. They simply don't arrive. Publishers I spoke to at the time suggested that chemistry was, perhaps not 'sexy' enough.

Meanwhile we have seen some topics that don't get much coverage do well. I want to highlight Henry Gee's A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth, which recently (deservedly) won this year's Royal Society's book prize. I have to include a disclaimer that I count Henry as a friend - but then that's case with a good number of other UK-based science writers. It also points to the positive side of social media, which usually only gets bad press. I first 'met' Henry through a now long-defunct Nature initiative of setting up blogs on their website, which we both took part in (Henry also works for the publication). I think I've only met Henry twice in person, but our online interactions more than make up for this.

It's not, however, just chemistry that suffers in terms of exposure. This site covers popular science and science fiction books. I have written elsewhere how SF (and other genre fiction) is regarded as a poor cousin of literary fiction. Similarly, I'd suggest, popular science tends to be somewhat sidelined in the non-fiction world. My local independent bookshop has one shelf (not one bookcase) of popular science titles. Waterstones, the UK's biggest bookshop chain, seems to have subsumed popular science entirely into their vague 'smart thinking' section (at least in the store I go in most often). 

What's more, I noticed the other day that the respectable publisher OneWorld, which has a good science list, recently put out a 'Christmas Gift Guide' with a sole popular science contribution of Sean Carroll's interesting but hardly approachable Biggest Ideas in the Universe title. Don't listen to them! Popular science (and SF) books make great gifts.

I think part of the problem is that there is a view in the literary world that good books have to be hard going. Anything that smacks of being enjoyable - whether it's well written popular science or entertaining science fiction - takes second place to titles that are worthy. This particularly comes across when newspapers do a 'What I'm reading' thing. You know for certain that what the chosen celebrities will list are books that are considered challenging. Frankly, for me, whether it's fiction or non-fiction, I don't read to suffer, I read for enjoyment and interest. But that rarely seems to be a criterion in the literary world.

Luckily, though they may not often make the bestseller lists, excellent popular science and SF books continue to be produced. There was a time when it was suggested such 'midlist' books were dying out because everything would either be blockbusters or self-published to an audience of three. Thankfully, that has not happened, in part due to the translation market, as many good English language popular science books do well in other languages (and to some extent vice versa).

So I wish you a happy Christmas if you celebrate it, and a great New Year - and look forward to reading many excellent books in 2023.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more