Skip to main content

Seasonal review 2022

Image from Unsplash
There may not be any reviews here now until January 2023 as we like to take a break - but our reviews will be back again in January.

Topics come and go in the popular science world - looking back over 2022, brains/consciousness, climate change, AI and space/cosmology have been the most dominant in terms of review titles. As someone with a particular interest in physics and maths, I'd love to see a few more of those next year. And chemistry remains the least covered of the core science subjects. 

A few years ago I speculated on why this was the case. Back then (2017) this site had 22 books under 'chemistry' as opposed to 97 maths, 126 biology and 182 physics. Admittedly, there is always a danger of editorial bias, but I have certainly never avoided chemistry titles if publishers sent them my way. They simply don't arrive. Publishers I spoke to at the time suggested that chemistry was, perhaps not 'sexy' enough.

Meanwhile we have seen some topics that don't get much coverage do well. I want to highlight Henry Gee's A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth, which recently (deservedly) won this year's Royal Society's book prize. I have to include a disclaimer that I count Henry as a friend - but then that's case with a good number of other UK-based science writers. It also points to the positive side of social media, which usually only gets bad press. I first 'met' Henry through a now long-defunct Nature initiative of setting up blogs on their website, which we both took part in (Henry also works for the publication). I think I've only met Henry twice in person, but our online interactions more than make up for this.

It's not, however, just chemistry that suffers in terms of exposure. This site covers popular science and science fiction books. I have written elsewhere how SF (and other genre fiction) is regarded as a poor cousin of literary fiction. Similarly, I'd suggest, popular science tends to be somewhat sidelined in the non-fiction world. My local independent bookshop has one shelf (not one bookcase) of popular science titles. Waterstones, the UK's biggest bookshop chain, seems to have subsumed popular science entirely into their vague 'smart thinking' section (at least in the store I go in most often). 

What's more, I noticed the other day that the respectable publisher OneWorld, which has a good science list, recently put out a 'Christmas Gift Guide' with a sole popular science contribution of Sean Carroll's interesting but hardly approachable Biggest Ideas in the Universe title. Don't listen to them! Popular science (and SF) books make great gifts.

I think part of the problem is that there is a view in the literary world that good books have to be hard going. Anything that smacks of being enjoyable - whether it's well written popular science or entertaining science fiction - takes second place to titles that are worthy. This particularly comes across when newspapers do a 'What I'm reading' thing. You know for certain that what the chosen celebrities will list are books that are considered challenging. Frankly, for me, whether it's fiction or non-fiction, I don't read to suffer, I read for enjoyment and interest. But that rarely seems to be a criterion in the literary world.

Luckily, though they may not often make the bestseller lists, excellent popular science and SF books continue to be produced. There was a time when it was suggested such 'midlist' books were dying out because everything would either be blockbusters or self-published to an audience of three. Thankfully, that has not happened, in part due to the translation market, as many good English language popular science books do well in other languages (and to some extent vice versa).

So I wish you a happy Christmas if you celebrate it, and a great New Year - and look forward to reading many excellent books in 2023.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin Five Way Interview

Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin (born in 1999) is a distinguished composer, concert pianist, music theorist and researcher. Three of his piano CDs have been released in Germany. He started his undergraduate degree at the age of 13 in Kazakhstan, and having completed three musical doctorates in prominent Italian music institutions at the age of 20, he has mastered advanced composition techniques. In 2024 he completed a PhD in music at the University of St Andrews / Royal Conservatoire of Scotland (researching timbre-texture co-ordinate in avant- garde music), and was awarded The Silver Medal of The Worshipful Company of Musicians, London. He has held visiting affiliations at the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge and UCL, and has been lecturing and giving talks internationally since the age of 13. His latest book is Quantum Mechanics and Avant Garde Music . What links quantum physics and avant-garde music? The entire book is devoted to this question. To put it briefly, there are many different link...
Post a Comment
Read more

Should we question science?

I was surprised recently by something Simon Singh put on X about Sabine Hossenfelder. I have huge admiration for Simon, but I also have a lot of respect for Sabine. She has written two excellent books and has been helpful to me with a number of physics queries - she also had a really interesting blog, and has now become particularly successful with her science videos. This is where I'm afraid she lost me as audience, as I find video a very unsatisfactory medium to take in information - but I know it has mass appeal. This meant I was concerned by Simon's tweet (or whatever we are supposed to call posts on X) saying 'The Problem With Sabine Hossenfelder: if you are a fan of SH... then this is worth watching.' He was referencing a video from 'Professor Dave Explains' - I'm not familiar with Professor Dave (aka Dave Farina, who apparently isn't a professor, which is perhaps a bit unfortunate for someone calling out fakes), but his videos are popular and he...
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on...
Post a Comment
Read more