Skip to main content

How Your Brain Works - Greg Gage and Tim Marzullo ***

As soon as you see the cover of this book, it feels like it's going to be light hearted and super fun (or at least it seems the authors want it to be this). In practice, it's not. It might have big, Joy of Sex style line drawings and an odd shape with cheap feeling paper, but the content is fairly straightforwardly serious. 

In the introduction Greg Gage and Tim Marzullo tells us that 'There are many examples of how amateur scientists add to our collective understanding of nature.' This feels a dubious statement at best - it's obviously true historically when professional scientists didn't exist, but these days amateur contributions are distinctly niche. If you think of any of the really big scientific breakthroughs of the last 100 years, there isn't a lot of amateur input. And using this book certainly won't add anything.

Once we get into the book proper, it delivers on at least part of the subtitle 'neuroscience experiments for everyone' - the whole book is driven by home neuroscience. The very first item is an introduction to neurons. After a little text we are told to immerse a (live) cockroach from 'your container' in ice water to anaesthetise it before pulling off one of its legs. (I'm already feeling a touch queasy.) We then put pins through the leg with wires attached, then 'connect the wires to the SpikerBox.' Hang on, the what? It turns out we need a complex bit of electronic gubbins to do these experiments. To be fair to the authors, they provide circuit diagrams to build your own, which could be used by anyone who could build a basic computer from components - i.e. hardly anybody. Or you can buy one from their online store - as indeed you can a box of cockroaches.

We go on to be taken through a range of cockroach-based neuronal experiments, from exploring different senses to the speed of neurons and the impact on them of drugs. We then move on to the human brain with another set of equipment used as a basic EEG. Finally we take on the human nervous system, employing more tech: both EEG and EMG equipment. There's no doubt that there's a lot to explore here, and the reader will find out a lot about the basics of neurons, human brains and the human nervous system - though it is arguable how much benefit is gained from doing the experiments.

We do have a bit of a problem with that claim of neuroscience experiments 'for everyone'. If you don't live in the US you probably won't be able to obtain live cockroaches from Gage and Marzullo's store (though a quick internet search will probably bring up a local supplier). But their SpikerBoxes are not cheap - we're talking a minimum of around $200 to get a mid-range bundled neutron kit sent to the UK, while the human SpikerBox will set you back $350. This isn't DIY experiments with stuff you find in the kitchen drawer.

There's also a slight concern that doing these experiments truly benefits anyone. Of course it's useful for would-be scientists to learn how to do experiments - that's one of the reasons they go to university. But pulling legs of cockroaches at home, for example, to perform an experiment that could easily be described and that adds nothing to scientific knowledge seems an unnecessary step. The human parts are less of an issue - you don't have to pull off any human limbs, for example.

This is an interesting idea, and I'm sure it will appeal to some, just as doing chemistry experiments at home appealed to me in my teens. But as a book, this isn't one I enjoyed reading or would give to an enthusiastic teen.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on