Skip to main content

How Your Brain Works - Greg Gage and Tim Marzullo ***

As soon as you see the cover of this book, it feels like it's going to be light hearted and super fun (or at least it seems the authors want it to be this). In practice, it's not. It might have big, Joy of Sex style line drawings and an odd shape with cheap feeling paper, but the content is fairly straightforwardly serious. 

In the introduction Greg Gage and Tim Marzullo tells us that 'There are many examples of how amateur scientists add to our collective understanding of nature.' This feels a dubious statement at best - it's obviously true historically when professional scientists didn't exist, but these days amateur contributions are distinctly niche. If you think of any of the really big scientific breakthroughs of the last 100 years, there isn't a lot of amateur input. And using this book certainly won't add anything.

Once we get into the book proper, it delivers on at least part of the subtitle 'neuroscience experiments for everyone' - the whole book is driven by home neuroscience. The very first item is an introduction to neurons. After a little text we are told to immerse a (live) cockroach from 'your container' in ice water to anaesthetise it before pulling off one of its legs. (I'm already feeling a touch queasy.) We then put pins through the leg with wires attached, then 'connect the wires to the SpikerBox.' Hang on, the what? It turns out we need a complex bit of electronic gubbins to do these experiments. To be fair to the authors, they provide circuit diagrams to build your own, which could be used by anyone who could build a basic computer from components - i.e. hardly anybody. Or you can buy one from their online store - as indeed you can a box of cockroaches.

We go on to be taken through a range of cockroach-based neuronal experiments, from exploring different senses to the speed of neurons and the impact on them of drugs. We then move on to the human brain with another set of equipment used as a basic EEG. Finally we take on the human nervous system, employing more tech: both EEG and EMG equipment. There's no doubt that there's a lot to explore here, and the reader will find out a lot about the basics of neurons, human brains and the human nervous system - though it is arguable how much benefit is gained from doing the experiments.

We do have a bit of a problem with that claim of neuroscience experiments 'for everyone'. If you don't live in the US you probably won't be able to obtain live cockroaches from Gage and Marzullo's store (though a quick internet search will probably bring up a local supplier). But their SpikerBoxes are not cheap - we're talking a minimum of around $200 to get a mid-range bundled neutron kit sent to the UK, while the human SpikerBox will set you back $350. This isn't DIY experiments with stuff you find in the kitchen drawer.

There's also a slight concern that doing these experiments truly benefits anyone. Of course it's useful for would-be scientists to learn how to do experiments - that's one of the reasons they go to university. But pulling legs of cockroaches at home, for example, to perform an experiment that could easily be described and that adds nothing to scientific knowledge seems an unnecessary step. The human parts are less of an issue - you don't have to pull off any human limbs, for example.

This is an interesting idea, and I'm sure it will appeal to some, just as doing chemistry experiments at home appealed to me in my teens. But as a book, this isn't one I enjoyed reading or would give to an enthusiastic teen.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more