Skip to main content

The Genetic Age - Matthew Cobb *****

This big book is a deep dive into the history of a relatively new aspect of science - genetic modification - from the first crude steps to the sophistication of CRISPR-based gene editing.

Matthew Cobb takes us through the basics of what is involved in genetic modification technically, from attempts dating back to the late 60s using a phage (a virus that attacks bacteria) to extract a gene from a bacterium up to the apparent precision of modern gene editing. But the importance of this book is not in giving us an increased understanding of plasmids or homologous recombination (don't biologists love vast numbers of technical terms?), but rather in getting a clear picture of how the science of genetic modification has developed and the disputes that have taken place over the ethics of undertaking these experiments.

One thing that surprised me, as someone with no familiarity with this aspect of science, was how much of the ethical concerns came from the scientists themselves. Possibly because scientific debate tends not to be undertaken through the media, I was more familiar with protestors destroying GM crops, or politicians debating the rights and wrongs, but Cobb opens up the efforts by some within the field to have controls or even moratoria, while others wanted to forge ahead, arguing that science should not be held back.

It's all interesting, but everything moves up a notch when we get on the gene editing capabilities of CRISPR, and particularly the potential and risk of using it to do germline editing on human embryos that would lead to an inheritable genetic change. Cobb describes well the shock when this was undertaken for real by a Chinese scientist, making clear that what was done to these (now) children was nowhere near as precise and targeted as the hype around CRISPR suggests and produced 'mosaics' where not all cells had the same versions of their genes. In referring to another CRISPR experiment, Cobb bluntly puts it 'CRISPR is described as "editing", but this looked like someone had been using a word processor while wearing boxing gloves.' He also highlights how much the vagueness of the scientific establishment in what was and wasn't considered acceptable was part of the problem.

All the way through, Cobb is even handed in that he emphasises both the potential benefits and risks of different genetic modifications. (This was one of the damning aspects of the CRISPR experiment producing children - there were plenty of risks but no benefits.) Often, given the huge amount of hype around these technologies, it seems that things are significantly more complicated than the sales pitch suggests - and it's arguable whether the benefits are worth what has been done. There is no doubt that much genetic work has had benefits in understanding genetics, but even widely recognised positive outcomes, such genetically modified golden rice, are shown to be mixed bags. One little aside - I don't know if Cobb has had a bad experience with the journal Nature at some point, but he mentions them a lot, and it's rarely in a positive light.

It's interesting that a number of the puffs in the blurb make a point of emphasising the depth of the research. This is obviously true - while never getting too heavily into the science to make it unapproachable, Cobb gives us lots of detail on exactly who did what when. This is great to an extent - but for me, it was too much. My first instinct was to say that the book is too long - but on checking, there are only 368 (admittedly large) pages of main text. It's more that there is so much detail that it feels long. It's always difficult to know what to cut, especially when you've invested as much time and effort as Cobb clearly has in this book, but the manuscript would have benefited from some pruning to make it perfect.

That doesn't stop this being a truly valuable book, though. Most of us get very big picture ideas of what's going on with gene editing and other genetic modifications from the media. Now we've got the real story.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...