Skip to main content

The Genetic Age - Matthew Cobb *****

This big book is a deep dive into the history of a relatively new aspect of science - genetic modification - from the first crude steps to the sophistication of CRISPR-based gene editing.

Matthew Cobb takes us through the basics of what is involved in genetic modification technically, from attempts dating back to the late 60s using a phage (a virus that attacks bacteria) to extract a gene from a bacterium up to the apparent precision of modern gene editing. But the importance of this book is not in giving us an increased understanding of plasmids or homologous recombination (don't biologists love vast numbers of technical terms?), but rather in getting a clear picture of how the science of genetic modification has developed and the disputes that have taken place over the ethics of undertaking these experiments.

One thing that surprised me, as someone with no familiarity with this aspect of science, was how much of the ethical concerns came from the scientists themselves. Possibly because scientific debate tends not to be undertaken through the media, I was more familiar with protestors destroying GM crops, or politicians debating the rights and wrongs, but Cobb opens up the efforts by some within the field to have controls or even moratoria, while others wanted to forge ahead, arguing that science should not be held back.

It's all interesting, but everything moves up a notch when we get on the gene editing capabilities of CRISPR, and particularly the potential and risk of using it to do germline editing on human embryos that would lead to an inheritable genetic change. Cobb describes well the shock when this was undertaken for real by a Chinese scientist, making clear that what was done to these (now) children was nowhere near as precise and targeted as the hype around CRISPR suggests and produced 'mosaics' where not all cells had the same versions of their genes. In referring to another CRISPR experiment, Cobb bluntly puts it 'CRISPR is described as "editing", but this looked like someone had been using a word processor while wearing boxing gloves.' He also highlights how much the vagueness of the scientific establishment in what was and wasn't considered acceptable was part of the problem.

All the way through, Cobb is even handed in that he emphasises both the potential benefits and risks of different genetic modifications. (This was one of the damning aspects of the CRISPR experiment producing children - there were plenty of risks but no benefits.) Often, given the huge amount of hype around these technologies, it seems that things are significantly more complicated than the sales pitch suggests - and it's arguable whether the benefits are worth what has been done. There is no doubt that much genetic work has had benefits in understanding genetics, but even widely recognised positive outcomes, such genetically modified golden rice, are shown to be mixed bags. One little aside - I don't know if Cobb has had a bad experience with the journal Nature at some point, but he mentions them a lot, and it's rarely in a positive light.

It's interesting that a number of the puffs in the blurb make a point of emphasising the depth of the research. This is obviously true - while never getting too heavily into the science to make it unapproachable, Cobb gives us lots of detail on exactly who did what when. This is great to an extent - but for me, it was too much. My first instinct was to say that the book is too long - but on checking, there are only 368 (admittedly large) pages of main text. It's more that there is so much detail that it feels long. It's always difficult to know what to cut, especially when you've invested as much time and effort as Cobb clearly has in this book, but the manuscript would have benefited from some pruning to make it perfect.

That doesn't stop this being a truly valuable book, though. Most of us get very big picture ideas of what's going on with gene editing and other genetic modifications from the media. Now we've got the real story.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more