Skip to main content

The Actuality (SF) - Paul Braddon ****

An exploration of the world experienced by a near-human artificial lifeform, trying to make her way and discover herself in an inimical world. It's not a new topic, of course. Since Asimov's robot stories in the 1950s there has been plenty of examination of this concept - and strictly it wasn't new then, as it's pretty much the theme of Pinocchio, dating back to 1883. This could hardly be more clear from the movie AI -Artificial Intelligence (and to a lesser degree the Brian Aldiss short story it was based on, Supertoys Last All Summer Long) where the puppet from Pinocchio is replaced by a synthetic human. 

The fact this is a well-trodden path isn't a problem, though, because Paul Braddon manages to find new things to say and gives us an intriguing plot for Evie, the artificially intelligent creation in his novel. I was a bit worried for part of the first section of the book, which is quite slow, reflecting Evie's relatively limited life at that point, and set in a world more reminiscent of a 1920s country house than a twenty-first century London. In fact, it was ironic, after the recent venture by Kazuo Ishiguro into this topic, given Ishiguro's best known output being set in an English country house. Braddon's vision of the future also felt a little old-fashioned - an economically collapsed England where the dollar is preferred to the pound - not only are such dystopias starting to feel dated, but if they needed revisiting, the renminbi seem far more likely to be dominant than the dollar. But Braddon's book is far more readable than Ishiguro's Klara and the Sun, while Evie seems a far more technically savvy creation than the oddly ignorant Klara.

I very much liked the way that Braddon makes Evie neither evil nor good, both extremes that can limit development in a character - instead there were plenty of shades of grey. Some of the other characters are less well filled-out, but even so, it's a book that manages to balance plot and character well. A definite positive addition to the AI/robot/android literature.

There was one thing I really didn't like about this book - it seems to be set in alternate universe. Not only has Braddon moved the Channel Tunnel from Folkstone to Dover, here we have a twenty-first century where trains (on a line that's currently electrified) are diesel powered. The idea of still using fossil fuels in the next century seems more like set dressing for the dystopian setting. I do also wonder if there isn't a bit too much homage to other Science Fiction titles (the antithesis of Ishiguro, who seems never to have read SF). Is it a coincidence that the American AI that Evie meets is called David, like the AI in the movie? And Evie's flight to the continent has more than a ring of Logan's Run to it. Throw in repeated Pinocchio aspects, more than a touch of the films Blade Runner and Ex Machina and even a nod to the 1931 Frankenstein movie and there seemed to be a lot of cultural referencing.

There is no doubt this novel has flaws (including the ending, which I really didn't like) - but overall it was engaging and enjoyable, while Evie's character had a lot more to interest the reader than is the case in many such books. A good debut by Braddon.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

  1. The concept of telepresence and very well characterized in the movie Surrogates (2009) is more than interesting. Today and with the post-pandemic consequences, it could be relaunched with some technology similar to the one in the film.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on