Skip to main content

The Actuality (SF) - Paul Braddon ****

An exploration of the world experienced by a near-human artificial lifeform, trying to make her way and discover herself in an inimical world. It's not a new topic, of course. Since Asimov's robot stories in the 1950s there has been plenty of examination of this concept - and strictly it wasn't new then, as it's pretty much the theme of Pinocchio, dating back to 1883. This could hardly be more clear from the movie AI -Artificial Intelligence (and to a lesser degree the Brian Aldiss short story it was based on, Supertoys Last All Summer Long) where the puppet from Pinocchio is replaced by a synthetic human. 

The fact this is a well-trodden path isn't a problem, though, because Paul Braddon manages to find new things to say and gives us an intriguing plot for Evie, the artificially intelligent creation in his novel. I was a bit worried for part of the first section of the book, which is quite slow, reflecting Evie's relatively limited life at that point, and set in a world more reminiscent of a 1920s country house than a twenty-first century London. In fact, it was ironic, after the recent venture by Kazuo Ishiguro into this topic, given Ishiguro's best known output being set in an English country house. Braddon's vision of the future also felt a little old-fashioned - an economically collapsed England where the dollar is preferred to the pound - not only are such dystopias starting to feel dated, but if they needed revisiting, the renminbi seem far more likely to be dominant than the dollar. But Braddon's book is far more readable than Ishiguro's Klara and the Sun, while Evie seems a far more technically savvy creation than the oddly ignorant Klara.

I very much liked the way that Braddon makes Evie neither evil nor good, both extremes that can limit development in a character - instead there were plenty of shades of grey. Some of the other characters are less well filled-out, but even so, it's a book that manages to balance plot and character well. A definite positive addition to the AI/robot/android literature.

There was one thing I really didn't like about this book - it seems to be set in alternate universe. Not only has Braddon moved the Channel Tunnel from Folkstone to Dover, here we have a twenty-first century where trains (on a line that's currently electrified) are diesel powered. The idea of still using fossil fuels in the next century seems more like set dressing for the dystopian setting. I do also wonder if there isn't a bit too much homage to other Science Fiction titles (the antithesis of Ishiguro, who seems never to have read SF). Is it a coincidence that the American AI that Evie meets is called David, like the AI in the movie? And Evie's flight to the continent has more than a ring of Logan's Run to it. Throw in repeated Pinocchio aspects, more than a touch of the films Blade Runner and Ex Machina and even a nod to the 1931 Frankenstein movie and there seemed to be a lot of cultural referencing.

There is no doubt this novel has flaws (including the ending, which I really didn't like) - but overall it was engaging and enjoyable, while Evie's character had a lot more to interest the reader than is the case in many such books. A good debut by Braddon.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

  1. The concept of telepresence and very well characterized in the movie Surrogates (2009) is more than interesting. Today and with the post-pandemic consequences, it could be relaunched with some technology similar to the one in the film.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...