Skip to main content

Klara and the Sun (SF) - Kazuo Ishiguro ***

There is always a significant danger when a member of the literari takes on a science fiction theme - the result can easily seem derivative and dull when covering a topic that has already been better explored by others. (Of course the literary fiction audience are unlikely to realise this.) Sadly, there is an element of this danger manifest in Kazuo Ishiguro's new novel.

The theme is a well-trodden one. A robot with strong artificial intelligence faces up to emotions and is used to explore the human condition. Here called 'artificial friends' we can see a progression to such companion robots from the current wave of cuddly robot pets, producing a device that has general artificial intelligence giving it the abilities and emotions of a human being. Klara is both a companion to and a replacement for a dying child.

Of course there is nothing wrong with exploring a well-trodden path if you have something new to say, but most what occurs in Klara and the Sun is anything but original. Most recently we've had Set my Heart to Five, with a robot discovering emotions - but there were plenty of closer parallels to this storyline earlier. One should even be familiar to film fans in the troubled movie AI, started by Kubrick and finished by Spielberg, where a robot child is manufactured for similar reasons to Klara - a story that despite the clunkiness of the film manages still to be moving, and that is done far better in the original Brian Aldiss short story.

Earlier, of course, Isaac Asimov covered robots and society over a wide range of short stories and novels - and it's a topic that has been covered many times since by master in the field. One problem that emerges once comparisons are made is that SF writers tend to know a lot more about the science. General artificial intelligence is nightmarishly complex thing to create, far beyond our current capabilities. To think that this could be done any time soon is itself unlikely. But that Klara would at the same time be totally unworldly and lacking in the abilities that even IBM's Jeopardy-winning computer Watson had to look information up and give it context from online sources is simply ignorant. We know all SF gets it wrong about the future - look at some of the technology in the original series of Star Trek, for instance - but at least it starts from what's known at the time, rather than ignoring science and technology.

I had genuinely hoped to find something new and interesting in Ishiguro's take on the subject, but the core is very much more of the same, with the addition of frankly tedious over-writing. There's a meme doing the rounds of social media headed 'Book Blurbs - glossary of terms' which defines 'Epic' as 'cowed by the author's reputation'. That has clearly happened here in a book that could do with a sweeping edit to clear out the deadwood. 

It's not all bad. But it could have been so much better.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more