Skip to main content

The Search for Life on Mars - Elizabeth Howell and Nicholas Booth ***

From the book’s enticing subtitle, ‘The Greatest Scientific Detective Story of All Time’, I was expecting something rather different. I thought the authors would kick off by introducing the suspects (the various forms life might take on Mars, either now or in the past) and the kind of telltale traces they might leave, followed by a chronological account of the detectives (i.e. scientists) searching for those traces, ruling out certain suspects and focusing on others, turning up unexpected new clues, and so on. But the book is nothing like that. Continuing with the fiction analogy, this isn’t a novel so much as a collection of short stories – eleven self-contained chapters, each with its own set of protagonists, suspects and clues.

 Some of the chapters work better than others. I found the first three – which despite their early placement cover NASA’s most recent Mars missions – the most irritating. For one thing, they unfold in a way that’s at odds with the cerebral ‘detective story’ nature of science. It’s closer to the lowbrow end of crime fiction, where the protagonist rushes off without stopping to think, gets hit on the head, wakes up to find a new lead, chases off after it, and so on until finally stumbling on the solution. That’s not the way science works, but it’s how the narrative plays out in parts of this book. For example, when the Curiosity rover detects a methane spike on Mars, that’s the first mention of methane in the book. For many journalists, it may also have been the first time they learned that methane was a potential indicator of life – but not for the scientists, who were eagerly seeking it for that very reason. Telling the story in the correct order – idea first, discovery second – would have been a truer reflection of the way science works, as well as delivering on the ‘detective story’ promise of the book’s subtitle.

 The other thing making these early chapters tough going – for me, at least – is that much of the exposition is via direct-speech quotations from the numerous scientists and engineers involved. This kind of thing works well in a TV documentary, where the viewer can see the person speaking, but it’s fairly pointless in a book where all you see is the written word. This prevalence of quotations works better in later chapters – when we go back to earlier events – because it’s more likely that a single interviewee can tell the whole story, without the need to keep jumping between speakers.

 It’s at this point, where we get into the history of the subject, that I started to enjoy the book. Chapters such as those on the Viking landers and the ‘Martian meteorite’ ALH 84001 may cover familiar ground, but they’re still first-rate treatments of two great moments in science. Less familiar, but just as good, is the chapter on Donna Shirley and the Sojourner rover – probably the most effective use of the authors’ penchant for interview soundbites.

 Of all the chapters, the one that comes closest to the ‘detective story’ format promised by the subtitle deals with water on Mars – and it’s another of the book’s high points. This one has a satisfying ending too, because we can say for certain that the Red Planet had flowing water in the past, and still has plenty of ice today. But there’s no neat ending to the book itself, since the question of life on Mars remains as unanswered as ever. So the story ends with a cliff-hanger – preparations for the launch of NASA’s next rover, Perseverance, later this year, and the various other missions intended to follow it.

 The book’s authors are professional journalists, and the result is noticeably journalistic in style. I don’t mean that as a pejorative – they’re academically qualified and write seriously, so think New Scientist rather than Daily Express – but it accounts for their focus on events and personalities, rather than the underpinning ideas and logical reasoning. If I was mildly disappointed by the book, it’s because I was hoping to see more on the latter.

Hardback:    
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Andrew May
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more