Skip to main content

Patricia Fara - Four Way Interview

Patricia Fara lectures in the history of science at Cambridge University, where she is a Fellow of Clare College. She was the President of the British Society for the History of Science (2016-18) and her prize-winning book, Science: A Four Thousand Year History (OUP, 2009), has been translated into nine languages. An experienced public lecturer, Patricia Fara appears regularly in TV documentaries and radio programmes. She also contributes articles and reviews to many popular magazines and journals, including History Today, BBC History, New Scientist, Nature and the Times Literary SupplementHer new book is Erasmus Darwin.

Why history of science?
I read physics at university, but half-way through the course I realised that had been a big mistake. Although I relished the intellectual challenge, I was bored by the long hours spent lining up recalcitrant instruments in dusty laboratories. Why was nobody encouraging us to think about the big questions – What is gravity? Does quantum mechanics match reality? Can time run backwards? After three years, I escaped into a career in computing and educational publishing, determined to leave academia for ever.

Twenty years later, I was back in college, still pursuing the mysteries of the cosmos. Gradually I came to reverse my earlier views, and feel that it was more important to study people than invisible atoms and mathematical laws. Now I had some new Big Questions – How has western science come to dominate the world during the last few hundred years? Is science always right? Which is more important – travelling to Mars or building new hospitals in Africa?

Finding some answers involved thinking about politics, economics, literature, religion…And that is what makes history of science so rewarding and fascinating – it’s the history of everything.


Why this book?
I love historical research and wanted readers to share the thrill of pursuing a detective trail to search for new pieces of evidence. So many books are written as if the author were omniscient, an objective observer who knows the story already and only needs to find the best way of telling it. But for me, one of the wonderful aspects of history is that there are so many tales to tell – different writers attach significance to different snippets of information.

When I started looking into Erasmus Darwin, I knew very little about him except that he was a provincial doctor, a driving force in British industrialisation, an expert on botany, and a prolific but very clunky poet. I soon discovered that however stiff and pompous he may look in his portraits, in reality he was a loving man (in both senses – both compassionate and sexy) who held radical political views and was unusually enlightened about women’s education.

During my search for my own version of Darwin, I allowed myself to be guided by serendipity – I took advantage of unexpected discoveries and travelled down side-tracks to see where they took me. Some of them turned out to be dead ends, but others led me to a dramatically new vision of someone often mentioned only as the grandfather of Charles.

Erasmus Darwin died in obscurity, his most scandalous work consigned to the Vatican’s banned list. His famous grandson inherited not only his stammer and aversion to alcohol, but also his determination to end slavery and his conviction that nature is red in tooth and claw. Long before the Victorian era, Erasmus Darwin had already formulated an influential theory of evolution – and this book describes my journey to that conclusion.


What’s next?
I’m very enthusiastic about my next book, Life after Gravity: Isaac Newton’s London Career, which is coming out in February 2021. Unlike other biographies of science’s greatest iconic figurehead, mine focuses on a neglected period – the three decades he spent in London running the Royal Mint. Moving in elite metropolitan circles, Newton accumulated wealth on the back of the international slave trade and exerted a long-lasting influence on the British economy. 
Enmeshed in Enlightenment politics and social events, Newton engaged in the linked spheres of early science and imperialist capitalism. Instead of the quiet cloisters and dark libraries of Cambridge’s all-male world, he now participated in fashionable London society, characterised by patronage relationships, raw ambition and sexual intrigues. An eminent Enlightenment figure, he served as an MP, entertained international visitors and mingled with Hanoverian royalty and aristocracy. 

Knighted by Queen Anne, a close ally of the influential Earl of Halifax, Newton occupied a powerful position as President of London’s Royal Society. He also became Master of the Mint, responsible for the nation’s money at a time of financial crisis. A major investor in the East India Company, Newton monitored the imported gold that was melted down for English guineas, and profited from the revenue generated by selling African captives to wealthy plantation owners in the Americas. 

The Enlightenment is celebrated as the Age of Reason, but the exploitation and disparity it fostered lie at the heart of modern democracy.


What’s exciting you at the moment?
I’ve always been passionate about communicating history of science, and recently I’ve teamed up with a wonderful singer/composer, Frances M Lynch, who shares my ambitions to break down conventional art-science boundaries. For several years, she has been running her extraordinary Scientific Minerva project, in which female composers create music to celebrate female scientists, both past and present. 

Thanks to her, I’ve been carrying out research into some fascinating women I would never have heard of otherwise. Their science and their tailor-made music are all described on the website, but they include the first black woman in aircraft engineering during the Second World War, the eighteenth-century mother of two who ran a school in Margate and invented Victorian England’s most popular astronomical board game, the first woman botanist to be elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, and the intrepid aviatrixes (the posh word for female pilot) who performed aerobatics in the world’s first all-female flying show in Northamptonshire in 1931.

Once lockdown is over, I’m looking forward to performing again with her at the Science Museum. But the event I’d most like to repeat is our visit to a primary school in a deprived part of London. After talks from me and a crab expert at the Natural History Museum, the children wrote their own words and music for an evening concert commemorating local women. It was an extremely moving occasion, and I’m enormously excited about joining Frances for her similar ventures in the future. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...