Skip to main content

Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz - Four Way Interview

Photo by John Cairns
Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz is Professor of Mammalian Development and Stem Cell Biology at the University of Cambridge, and Bren Professor in Biology and Bioengineering at Caltech. She has published over 150 papers and book chapters in top scientific journals and her work on embryos won the people’s vote for scientific breakthrough of the year in Science magazine. Her new book, co-authored with Roger Highfield, is The Dance of Life: symmetry, cells and how we become human.

Why science?

I fell in love with biology when I was a child because I loved doing experiments and seeing what happened. It was fascinating and enormous fun. I also fell in love with art at the same time. Art and science are both based on experiments and uncovering new paths to understand the world and ourselves. Why do we think the way we think? Where do our feelings come from? Is the 'right' answer always right? Where do we come from? How do parts of our body communicate with each other?  What is the nature of time? How do our cells measure time? Can I understand it?

I was raised in a laboratory so everyone around me was doing an experiment and asking questions.  But my passion for art is more difficult to track. It might have something to do with how I was dyslexic and yet wanted to communicate with people around me and so I started to express myself intuitively through art – mainly through abstract art and design. 

Science and art are both imaginative and creative. They allow me to find the miraculous in everyday life.

Why this book?

There are many excellent popular science books. Roger Highfield and I wanted The Dance of Life to be different and to cover not only the science of how our life starts and how we build ourselves but also to be a human story, my story.  We wanted our book to be an intimate and personal account of scientific discovery.  We wanted it to talk about conflicting thoughts – devotion but also sacrifice in pursuit of science; friendship but also competition, which both dominate scientific life.  We also wanted to show the joy of discovery. 

It was a challenge to write this book as we wrote it together – a man and a woman with different life experiences, with different schedules, with our brains working differently but we both share a passion for science, life and truth.  We were talking about some of the most complex and deepest feelings in my life and, at the same time, the most profound topics in biology, from the life of an embryo to stem cell research and the nature of our own origins. We wanted to explore what we currently understand and the limits of that understanding. We wanted to be honest in showing the life of a woman in science and the life of an immigrant. I was both and it nearly broke me at times. 

What’s next?

Recently I restarted my life. I moved my scientific and personal family from Cambridge (UK) to California. This last year has already been an amazing new challenge and experience. I hope some enlightenment will come from this new chapter along with the pure joy of discovery. 

I would consider writing a second book to expand on some of the ideas in The Dance of Life to show that we should be more open and prepared to contra polarizing views about science and woman especially in science. To me, science and art are about openness, creativity, a deep way of thinking and joy that brings happiness. 

What’s exciting you at the moment?

My research on combining biology with engineering.  Creating embryo models from stem cells – building synthetic embryos one cell at a time - and learning answers to all of the questions that have puzzled me since I was a little girl.

In LA, new collaborations allow me to bring new techniques in microscopy and imaging to let us see stem cells on their complex journey in embryo development, creating beautiful images that blend art with science.  Roger and I had always planned to bring even more art into The Dance of Life

Every week brings a new discovery in science. If you look into the last issue of journal Nature, you can see an image from our latest paper, on an amazing mechanism that embryos develop in the second week of their life. To allow them to grow, they make holes in a membrane ‘corset‘ that originally holds them tight. How ingenious! It is great time to write about breaking boundaries, just as embryos do. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth - Henry Gee *****

In writing this book, Henry Gee had a lot to live up to. His earlier title  The Accidental Species was a superbly readable and fascinating description of the evolutionary process leading to Homo sapiens . It seemed hard to beat - but he has succeeded with what is inevitably going to be described as a tour-de-force. As is promised on the cover, we are taken through nearly 4.6 billion years of life on Earth (actually rather more, as I'll cover below). It's a mark of Gee's skill that what could have ended up feeling like an interminable list of different organisms comes across instead as something of a pager turner. This is helped by the structuring - within those promised twelve chapters everything is divided up into handy bite-sized chunks. And although there certainly are very many species mentioned as we pass through the years, rather than feeling overwhelming, Gee's friendly prose and careful timing made the approach come across as natural and organic.  There was a w

On the Fringe - Michael Gordin *****

This little book is a pleasant surprise. That word 'little', by the way, is not intended as an insult, but a compliment. Kudos to OUP for realising that a book doesn't have to be three inches thick to be interesting. It's just 101 pages before you get to the notes - and that's plenty. The topic is fringe science or pseudoscience: it could be heavy going in a condensed form, but in fact Michael Gordin keeps the tone light and readable. In some ways, the most interesting bit is when Gordin plunges into just what pseudoscience actually is. As he points out, there are elements of subjectivity to this. For example, some would say that string theory is pseudoscience, even though many real scientists have dedicated their careers to it. Gordin also points out that, outside of denial (more on this a moment), many supporters of what most of us label pseudoscience do use the scientific method and see themselves as doing actual science. Gordin breaks pseudoscience down into a n

Michael D. Gordin - Four Way Interview

Michael D. Gordin is a historian of modern science and a professor at Princeton University, with particular interests in the physical sciences and in science in Russia and the Soviet Union. He is the author of six books, ranging from the periodic table to early nuclear weapons to the history of scientific languages. His most recent book is On the Fringe: Where Science Meets Pseudoscience (Oxford University Press). Why history of science? The history of science grabbed me long before I knew that there were actual historians of science out there. I entered college committed to becoming a physicist, drawn in by the deep intellectual puzzles of entropy, quantum theory, and relativity. When I started taking courses, I came to understand that what really interested me about those puzzles were not so much their solutions — still replete with paradoxes — but rather the rich debates and even the dead-ends that scientists had taken to trying to resolve them. At first, I thought this fell under