Skip to main content

A Brief Guide to Artificial Intelligence - James Stone ***(*)

Some brief guides miss the point and in reality go on for rather a long time, but this one very much does what it says on the tin. Readable in an hour, it gives us the basics of what modern artificial intelligence is and how it works. To achieve such brevity, James Stone has cut away much of the support mechanism of popular science - so we get very little background and historical context, limited storytelling and not much about applications. Instead, the focus is laser-sharp on delivering the basics of how neural networks work, where modern AI is successful and where it has a long way to go.

Broadly, Stone identifies two areas where AI triumphs - image recognition and playing games. If I'm honest, perhaps he is a little generous on the first of these - as he points out himself, tiny elements undetectable to the human eye can be sufficient to totally change what an image is recognised to be, and most of the techniques (he takes us through different types of machine learning) require a very large amount of training material where (again as Stone acknowledges) humans can often learn to recognise something with just a handful of examples. The AI technology is on firmer ground with its game playing - in chess, go, backgammon and a range of computer games, AI is now unbeatable, and teaching humans new approaches. What perhaps Stone doesn't emphasise enough is how much this demonstrates that AI's real success is in non-real world applications where the rules are clear and relatively simple, even if they haven't been specified to the system. In the real world, things are often more messy, again something that is acknowledged in, for example, being far less optimistic about self-driving cars than is often the case.

Stone gives us a good simple introduction to neural networks, back propagation, four different kinds of machine learning (from semi-supervised to reinforcement) and the dangers of overfitting, making it clear that even current AI is doing significantly more than curve fitting. The book (probably sensibly) brushes aside fears about AI might take over the world and displace humans as somewhat far fetched at the moment.

My only real disappointment was at the end of the book, where Stone tells us true AI is likely to emerge relatively soon, given it took just millions of years for flying to develop in the natural world, but just 66 to get from the Wright brothers to the Moon landing, citing acceleration of advancement that could be experimental. There are two problems with this. One is that the proper modern comparison with the Wright brothers is not space travel but commercial flights. These did indeed get much faster. The Wright brothers had an airspeed in the tens of miles per hour. Within 73 years, passengers could fly at 1,350 mph. But Concorde has now been withdrawn for nearly 20 years - instead of speeding up, we fly at less than half the speed. Even if you do take the leap from Wright brothers to Apollo - yes, that only took 66 years. But in over 50 years since we have done nothing comparable in space, let alone gone further and faster. Just because there was acceleration in the past does not mean it will continue.

I give the guide four stars for its solid, approachable and extremely brief introduction to the modern field, but three stars for lacking context and effective narrative. While approachable and doing the job admirably, it's not outstandingly particularly to read without that contextual material. Even so, for the right purpose it's an excellent little book.

Paperback:  
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more