Skip to main content

Tim Woollings - Four Way Interview

Tim Woollings is an Associate Professor in Physical Climate Science at the University of Oxford, leading a team of researchers in the Atmospheric Dynamics group. He obtained his PhD in Meteorology in 2005 and since then has worked on a variety of topics spanning weather prediction, atmospheric dynamics and circulation, and the effects of climate change. He has studied how the jet stream varies over weeks, years, and decades, and how we can better predict these changes. He was a contributing author on three chapters of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Tim worked at the University of Reading as a postdoc, research fellow and then lecturer before moving to the University of Oxford in 2013. He is now the Oxford Joint Chair of the Met Office Academic Partnership. His new book is Jet Stream.

Why climate?

It has never been more important to learn about how our climate system works, and how we are affecting it. You certainly get a lot of satisfaction when your work touches on hugely important and timely issues. But even putting these aspects aside, climate science is a wonderful area to work in because it's so varied, with projects often involving a mix of observations, theory and computer modelling. And the forecasting aspect really makes the subject special - every year we get to test all our theories in real time, for example by trying to predict what the coming winter might have in store for us. 

Why this book?

Any student who has taken an atmospheric circulation class will know how strongly regional climate patterns are shaped by the motion of the atmosphere, but there have been very few books which touch on this for a general audience. The more I researched, the more I realised that there are incredible stories to be told of how weather and climate patterns work and how they have influenced us. For me, it's all about understanding different parts of the world, so I structured the book as a travelogue, following the jet stream around the world and telling some of these stories as we go. 

What's next?

Most of my own work has focused on the northern hemisphere, particularly the North Atlantic / European region. Writing the book made me broaden my horizons and learn about lots of other places, but it is still largely about the north. Next, I really want to learn more about the southern hemisphere - what shapes its jet stream and how this impacts the human stories of the south. 

What's exciting you at the moment?

Now is an exciting time, as climate modelling centres around the world are releasing simulations from their latest computer models to contribute to the next report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. So scientists have a lot of new, more detailed simulations to look at, and we are starting to see interesting new results from groups around the world. This set of models looks likely to have a better simulation of the jet streams than ever before, which is great news. More worryingly, several of the new models warm more strongly in response to greenhouse gases than the older models, suggesting the risk of dangerous climate change could be even more serious than we thought. 


Popular posts from this blog

Patricia Fara - Four Way Interview

Patricia Fara lectures in the history of science at Cambridge University, where she is a Fellow of Clare College. She was the President of the British Society for the History of Science (2016-18) and her prize-winning book, Science: A Four Thousand Year History (OUP, 2009), has been translated into nine languages. An experienced public lecturer, Patricia Fara appears regularly in TV documentaries and radio programmes. She also contributes articles and reviews to many popular magazines and journals, including History Today, BBC History, New Scientist, Nature and the Times Literary SupplementHer new book is Erasmus Darwin.

Why history of science?
I read physics at university, but half-way through the course I realised that had been a big mistake. Although I relished the intellectual challenge, I was bored by the long hours spent lining up recalcitrant instruments in dusty laboratories. Why was nobody encouraging us to think about the big questions – What is gravity? Does quantum mechani…

The Idea of the Brain: Matthew Cobb *****

Matthew Cobb is one of those people that you can’t help but admire but also secretly hate just a little bit for being so awesome. He is professor for zoology at the University of Manchester with a sizable teaching load that he apparently masters with consummate skill. He’s a scientific researcher, who researches the sense of smell of fruit fly maggots; I kid you not!  He’s also an attentive and loving family father but he still finds time and energy to write brilliant history of science books, three to date. His first, The Egg and Sperm Race, describes the search for the secret of human reproduction in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and is one of my favourite history of science books, on the period. His second, Life’s Greatest Secret is a monster, both in scope and detail, description of the hunt to decipher the structure and function of DNA that along the way demolishes a whole boatload of modern history of science myths. The most recent, and the subject of this review, is

The Search for Life on Mars - Elizabeth Howell and Nicholas Booth ***

From the book’s enticing subtitle, ‘The Greatest Scientific Detective Story of All Time’, I was expecting something rather different. I thought the authors would kick off by introducing the suspects (the various forms life might take on Mars, either now or in the past) and the kind of telltale traces they might leave, followed by a chronological account of the detectives (i.e. scientists) searching for those traces, ruling out certain suspects and focusing on others, turning up unexpected new clues, and so on. But the book is nothing like that. Continuing with the fiction analogy, this isn’t a novel so much as a collection of short stories – eleven self-contained chapters, each with its own set of protagonists, suspects and clues.

Some of the chapters work better than others. I found the first three – which despite their early placement cover NASA’s most recent Mars missions – the most irritating. For one thing, they unfold in a way that’s at odds with the cerebral ‘detective story’ na…