Jillian Scudder - Four Way Interview

(c) Jennifer Manna

Jillian Scudder is an astrophysicist and assistant professor at Oberlin College, Ohio. She has been writing Astroquizzical, a blog answering space-related questions from the public, for over four years. Her writing has also been published in Forbes, Quartz, Medium, and The Conversation. Astroquizzical is her first book.

Why science?

I honestly really just love the process of trying to work out something new. Being a scientist lets me do that on multiple fronts - research is a process of trying to sort out something that no one has ever learned before in the most careful way you can, but at the end of that process, you've learned something absolutely brand new. Being a scientist also means explaining what you do to other people, and that's it's own kind of puzzle. No two people have the same information background, so when you're trying to figure out how to explain something, it's different every time.

Why this book?

I'd been running Astroquizzical the blog for about three years. Since the blog's format is to answer questions that get sent in by the general public, I had generated a lot of requested information about space. At some point, I figured that I had collected enough to fill a book, and I thought that it should work well as a book for a general audience. It took a lot of rewriting to make it a smooth read, instead of a series of articles, and what came out the other end is a book that covers a lot more of the oddball facts of space than your standard introduction to astronomy book might do.

What’s next?
I've got a lot of things happening - I've just started a teaching position at Oberlin College in Ohio, so there's some settling in to do there, but the blog will continue and has continued while the book was under way! I've no plans to stop answering questions for the blog Astroquizzical anytime soon, so there will be lots of new content from me anyways. On top of all this, I'm still an active researcher, trying to understand how galaxy interactions work, so I'm looking forward to new discoveries there too!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I'm really excited to have the book out and being read by lots of new people! This is a new experience for me, so it's really cool to see people pick it up and take one home. On a science front, I just got back from a conference with a bunch of people who all study galaxy interactions, and so I got to catch up on all the cool stuff everyone else is doing, and try to brainstorm new ideas with collaborators, which is really exciting. I find conferences really invigorating!

Comments

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

Webb's Universe - Maggie Aderin-Pocock ****

The Hubble was the space telescope that launched a thousand picture books destined for the coffee table, such as Hubble Legacy . Inevitably, its new, more capable brother, the Webb is following suit. Thankfully, though, this is more than just a picture book as you can only marvel so much over pretty pictures from space. The book is structured into three sections - the first is about the telescope itself, beginning with its predecessors, including, for instance, some interesting material on the pros and cons of using a Lagrange point for a telescope. The second looks at Webb's mission - what it's intended to capture and how it will do that. And the final section, around twice as big as the other two added together, takes us through the already impressive range of Webb imagery. That final section is where many such books descend into pure picture book territory, but Maggie Aderin-Pocock continues to include pages of informative text with diagrams showing, for example, how the sol

Search This Blog