Jillian Scudder - Four Way Interview

(c) Jennifer Manna

Jillian Scudder is an astrophysicist and assistant professor at Oberlin College, Ohio. She has been writing Astroquizzical, a blog answering space-related questions from the public, for over four years. Her writing has also been published in Forbes, Quartz, Medium, and The Conversation. Astroquizzical is her first book.

Why science?

I honestly really just love the process of trying to work out something new. Being a scientist lets me do that on multiple fronts - research is a process of trying to sort out something that no one has ever learned before in the most careful way you can, but at the end of that process, you've learned something absolutely brand new. Being a scientist also means explaining what you do to other people, and that's it's own kind of puzzle. No two people have the same information background, so when you're trying to figure out how to explain something, it's different every time.

Why this book?

I'd been running Astroquizzical the blog for about three years. Since the blog's format is to answer questions that get sent in by the general public, I had generated a lot of requested information about space. At some point, I figured that I had collected enough to fill a book, and I thought that it should work well as a book for a general audience. It took a lot of rewriting to make it a smooth read, instead of a series of articles, and what came out the other end is a book that covers a lot more of the oddball facts of space than your standard introduction to astronomy book might do.

What’s next?
I've got a lot of things happening - I've just started a teaching position at Oberlin College in Ohio, so there's some settling in to do there, but the blog will continue and has continued while the book was under way! I've no plans to stop answering questions for the blog Astroquizzical anytime soon, so there will be lots of new content from me anyways. On top of all this, I'm still an active researcher, trying to understand how galaxy interactions work, so I'm looking forward to new discoveries there too!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I'm really excited to have the book out and being read by lots of new people! This is a new experience for me, so it's really cool to see people pick it up and take one home. On a science front, I just got back from a conference with a bunch of people who all study galaxy interactions, and so I got to catch up on all the cool stuff everyone else is doing, and try to brainstorm new ideas with collaborators, which is really exciting. I find conferences really invigorating!

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog