Skip to main content

Forensic Science - Sanjukta Mondal ***(*)

The forensic scientist's work forms a fascinating part of crime drama, with the pathologist playing a big supporting role in many police procedurals, while some shows such as the various CSI series, Silent Witness, Bones, Waking the Dead drive the action from the forensics. It's not surprising, then, that Sanjukta Mondal makes good use of this TV introduction to this science both to introduce real concepts, but also to point out where the fictional versions get it wrong.

It's also essential to cover, as she does, the reality that forensic work has itself slipped up. The book's introduction finishes with a reference to the key phrase 'every contact leaves a trace' becoming a guiding principle, but then tells us 'Does that mean forensic science is foolproof? The answer is no. It comes with its own set of pitfalls.' And these pitfalls will form a significant part of telling the story of the development of forensic science as a discipline.

Although TV shows feature reguarly, the first fictional focus is on written detective science with Poe's Dupin and particularly Sherlock Holmes getting a look in as an inspiration for the real thing. We then take more of a dive into that 'every contact' concept to see the ways such contacts can be left and detected - and how technology has changed our abilities over the years. From there, Mondal moves on to toxicology - here Game of Thrones gets a mention as a fictional starter, but Agatha Christie, with her regular use of poison in her mysteries, takes centre stage.

From there we move onto 'crimes of past and present' - obviously this spends a lot of time on cold cases, where the Bones TV show provides the fictional factor (the 'present' part reflects the way that even with warmer cases, skeletal remains can be important). After taking a dip into the world of art crime (where real life forger Tom Keating provides a better story than any fiction), the final parts of the book take in forensic limitations and some TV show debunking. It's always fun to point out failures in dramas, though I'm not sure the debunking the ideal way to pull together the book.

My star rating for this book is ***(*) - in terms of the interesting stories and background I think it rates four stars, but Mondal's writing style can be a little breathless for my taste and the overall structure of the book feels a little confused. There are also a few little slips - notably that quote in the introduction was from the French forensic pioneer Edmond Locard, who, we are told, coined it in the seventeenth century - Locard was born in the late 1800s, and appears to have coined the phrase in the early 20th century. I can only assume it's a typo as there's quite a lot on Locard later in the book, assigned to the correct period.

If you enjoy a forensic science TV show, though, this is the ideal book to fill in some details of where it all came from. 

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...