The Tainted Cup (SF) - Robert Jackson Bennett *****

The science fiction/murder mystery crossover has been well-established in space opera and Earth-based high-tech futures, but The Tainted Cup gives us a very different, if equally impressive approach. Physical technology on the featured planet is pretty much medieval, but biological enhancements are commonplace. This is not due to advanced science, but rather with the approach of a herbalist on a planet where some of the biological specimens are able to cause such dramatic changes.

The narrator, Din, is a young assistant investigator recently started in his first position. His enhancements as an engraver are slightly reminiscent of a mentat in Dune, giving him perfect recall and leading to surprising sword fighting abilities. His boss, Ana, is more complex - a combination of Mycroft Holmes from the modern-day set Sherlock TV show and Judge Dee from van Gulik's remarkable books. Except she wears a blindfold most of the time and swears a lot more. (The author likens her to a cross between Nero Wolfe and Hannibal Lecter.)

There are distinct parallels with the approach of van Gulik's seventh century Chinese magistrate, both in a tendency to issue instructions on strips of parchment while rarely investigating personally, basing Ana's work on mental acuity, and in the rigidly structured society. The echoes are even stronger when the pair are joined by a heavy duty soldier, Captain Miljin.

What starts as the investigation of a single bizarre murder ends up dealing with society at the highest levels with multiple deaths and the opening of a rift in the sea wall that protects the land from sea-based leviathans. Although Bennett introduces a lot of novel concepts, it's never in a way that the reader gets lost - just immersed in a beautifully imagined world.

The overall result is magical, though despite the description, I would say this is SF not fantasy - there is no actual magic involved. I can't remember when I last read a book where I was so desperate to get back to it and continue the experience. If I could give it six stars, I would.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:

Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

I Wish They'd Taught Me That - Robin Pemantle and Julian Gould ***

Subtitled 'overlooked and omitted topics in mathematics', the obvious concern is that there is a good reason these topics are overlooked and omitted. Thankfully, this is not the case, but it's fair to say that despite attempts to dress it up that way, this isn't a recreational maths book. There's a fair description in the blurb: 'the topics which every undergraduate mathematics student "should" know, but has probably never encountered... magnificent secrets that are beautiful, useful and accessible.' As someone who many years ago did a degree with a fair amount of mathematics in it, I think it probably would have appealed back then - though to be honest a lot of it has disappeared from my memory, strongly reducing the entertainment value. Here's an example. The first real page contains the sentence: 'If you are handed a real number 𝓍 ∈ ⁠ ⁠, one way to tell if 𝓍 is rational or irrational is to look at sequences of rational numbers q n ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

Search This Blog