The Tainted Cup (SF) - Robert Jackson Bennett *****

The science fiction/murder mystery crossover has been well-established in space opera and Earth-based high-tech futures, but The Tainted Cup gives us a very different, if equally impressive approach. Physical technology on the featured planet is pretty much medieval, but biological enhancements are commonplace. This is not due to advanced science, but rather with the approach of a herbalist on a planet where some of the biological specimens are able to cause such dramatic changes.

The narrator, Din, is a young assistant investigator recently started in his first position. His enhancements as an engraver are slightly reminiscent of a mentat in Dune, giving him perfect recall and leading to surprising sword fighting abilities. His boss, Ana, is more complex - a combination of Mycroft Holmes from the modern-day set Sherlock TV show and Judge Dee from van Gulik's remarkable books. Except she wears a blindfold most of the time and swears a lot more. (The author likens her to a cross between Nero Wolfe and Hannibal Lecter.)

There are distinct parallels with the approach of van Gulik's seventh century Chinese magistrate, both in a tendency to issue instructions on strips of parchment while rarely investigating personally, basing Ana's work on mental acuity, and in the rigidly structured society. The echoes are even stronger when the pair are joined by a heavy duty soldier, Captain Miljin.

What starts as the investigation of a single bizarre murder ends up dealing with society at the highest levels with multiple deaths and the opening of a rift in the sea wall that protects the land from sea-based leviathans. Although Bennett introduces a lot of novel concepts, it's never in a way that the reader gets lost - just immersed in a beautifully imagined world.

The overall result is magical, though despite the description, I would say this is SF not fantasy - there is no actual magic involved. I can't remember when I last read a book where I was so desperate to get back to it and continue the experience. If I could give it six stars, I would.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:

Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge Introducing … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as … for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily, Introducing Artificial Intelligence is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

Search This Blog