Skip to main content

Tom Salinsky - Five Way Interview

Tom Salinsky is a writer, podcaster and corporate coach living in London with his wife and too many cats. With Deborah Frances-White, he is the author of The Improv Handbook (Methuen Drama, 2008). With Robert Khan he is the author of five plays and many audio dramas for Big Finish. With his podcast colleagues John Dorney and Jessica Regan, he is the author of Best Pick: A Journey Through Film History and the Academy Awards (Rowman & Littlefield, 2022). As a solo author, he has published Star Trek: Discovering the Television Series (Pen & Sword, 2024), the second volume of which is due for release in 2025. His latest title is  Red Dwarf: Discovering the TV Series.

Why science fiction?

I’m sure there are countless theories about why awkward teens gravitate towards science fiction and fantasy, but everyone likes a bit of escapism. And if your ordinary life is dull or scary or isolating or confusing, then you may well be drawn to escapism which is set in a world as unlike your ordinary life as possible. Ordinary well-adjusted young people can read bodice-ripper romances, watch mystery shows or enjoy comedy movies. But if there’s a secret world which you know the rules to and other people don’t, then there’s a power in that. Plus, you can make lists.

I wasn’t quite in the bullseye of that description, but as a child I was a voracious reader and I included a healthy dose of science fiction along with classic authors like Robert Louis Stevenson, Lewis Carroll, Arthur Ransome, Conan Doyle and PG Wodehouse. Then alternative comedy hit our TV screens, and I became obsessed with The Young Ones and Fry and Laurie. Red Dwarf captured all of my tastes in one package.

Why this book?

This book grew out of another obsession, which itself grew out of a previous one. Having recently completed a podcast series in which two friends and I watched every movie which had won Best Picture at the Academy Awards, I was contemplating another project and it occurred to me to wonder how much Star Trek I had seen. When I realised I could watch everything from the original series to Star Trek: Enterprise in just two years if I watched an episode a day, I decided to blog my progress. The blog became a book and when the publishers asked what else I had, I began to wonder how much Red Dwarf I’d seen. I drifted away from it in the late nineties, and I didn’t think I’d watched all of the recent Dave shows. And once again, if you aren’t obsessively cataloguing your progress, what are you even doing?

Why do you think so little SF humour works well on screen? (I can only really think of Red Dwarf and Galaxy Quest…)

It’s a weird blend of tones, and they’re both verbal/conceptual. Horror comedy works well because the horror part is visual and the comedy part is verbal (as a general rule) so you can dial both of them way up if you want and have something as insanely silly and gleefully gory as Evil Dead II. But the thing that makes Isaac Asimov stories compelling occupies the same space as what makes PG Wodehouse stories funny – especially when you take prose away in the move to the small screen. So, there is a bit more funny sci-fi and fantasy in prose form. The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy works best in prose, so do Terry Pratchett and (more obscurely) Robert Sheckley.

That having been said, if you’re hungry for a bit of on-screen science fiction humour, here are a few more to add to your list. On TV: Star Trek Lower Decks, Futurama, Rick and Morty, Mork and Mindy, 3rd Rock from the Sun, My Parents Are Aliens, The Orville, Avenue 5. And on the big screen: Back to the Future, Bill and Ted, Men in Black, Ghostbusters, Hot Tub Time Machine and of course, the one which inspired Rob Grant and Doug Naylor to create Red Dwarf: Dark Star. [Ed. My list was of SF humour that works on screen - many of these didn't work for me (while some are arguably fantasy). Ironically, despite loving Red Dwarf, I found Dark Star painfully unfunny - but that's the trouble with sense of humour...]

What’s next?

I have a play called The Gang of Three coming to the Kings Head in Islington about the British Labour Party in the 1970s, and the show I produced at the Edinburgh Fringe, 16 Postcodes, is going on tour.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I can’t wait for the return of Saturday Night Live which has been off the air during one of the most bonkers American summers I can remember. Speaking of long-running shows, it’s also going to be going into its 50th year, which is amazing.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more