Skip to main content

Alien Earths - Lisa Kaltenegger ****

After an introduction to exoplanets - planets orbiting stars other than the Sun - Alien Earths concentrates on the theory of and the search for life on these planets. Written by astronomy professor Lisa Kaltenegger, who runs the Carl Sagan Institute for the Search for Life in the Cosmos at Cornell University, it's a gentle guide to one of the most imaginative aspects of astronomy.

A fair amount of the content looks at what makes a habitable planet (which is not always an Earth-like situation), what life is and how we may be able to detect it a great distance. There are some good details here, though I would have appreciated more depth. Given this is such a speculative subject, there is also relatively little questioning of assumptions. For example, there's a description of the gold records sent out on Voyager 1 and 2, with detail of how to put a time interval across to aliens. 'The team [behind the records] solved this problem by using a time constant that any spacefaring civilisation should understand.' This involves the hyperfine transition 'spin flip' of hydrogen - but I've never met a human who could interpret the vague visual supposed to illustrate this, so I'm not sure how any alien could 

Kaltenegger's style is chatty - if anything, for me, it tries too hard in this respect. Each chapter starts with a fairly hefty chunk of supposedly engaging fluff. For example, the first proper chapter begins 'The foam on my Portuguese espresso tastes a little bitter, but I hardly notice. For the past hour, I've been staring at images on my computer screen, a live feed from NASA's recently launched James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).' Rather than make me feel warm and fuzzy, this just puts my back up a bit - I really don't care about someone else's coffee. A couple of paragraphs later, when she is watching the launch, we are told 'I kept reminding myself to breathe - in and out, in and out.' I think a little study of biology would suggest that no reminding is necessary with autonomous biological systems. It's just a bit overblown.

The other issue I have is about how speculative much of the theorising about alien life inevitably has to be. I appreciate we can't wait for flying saucers over Washington before we give any serious thought to what's out there, but I prefer my science to be more grounded in evidence. Nonetheless, lots of people do like a good dose of speculation (many science magazines thrive on it), so I appreciate that for others this is great fun.

All in all, Kaltenegger does a good job of making the topic approachable and interesting. It's not really for me (and if I were thinking only for myself I'd give it three stars), but for the right audience it does an excellent job.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

The Science of Weird Shit - Chris French ****

This is a highly engaging topic, but before diving into the content of the book I ought to mention two issues with its title. The first is that in this age of algorithmic censorship, the final word of the title can cause problems - the publisher had an issue with publicity emails being caught by spam filters, and I'm nervous enough about the contents of this review being pulled that I won't use it in the text. The other, more subtle problem is that it's only partially what the book is about - as the subtitle makes clear. Most of it doesn't concern the science of weird stuff, but rather the science of why many of us believe weird stuff. Those aren't the same things. Such is the joy of titles - often hard to get right. But what about the book itself? Considering it's covering what can be quite a showy field, it takes a measured approach (in fact, I'd say occasionally it's a bit too academic in feel, focused on relating facts with limited storytelling). Ho