Skip to main content

Strange Beauty - George Johnson ****

This is a second edition of a scientific biography of the American physicist Murray Gell-Mann, first published in 1999. This edition adds in the remaining 20 years of Gell-Mann's life. Like most scientists, his contributions may not have been as outstanding in his later years, but it gives the complete picture - and he certainly continued to be interesting as a person.

George Johnson (who clearly like a touch of scientific beauty, having previously written The Ten Most Beautiful Experiments) does a good job of taking us into both the world and work of Gell-Mann. Not a household name, but one of the greats of twentieth century physics. Part of the problem, compared with the science that came before - even most of Einstein's - was that, as Johnson puts it, Gell-Mann's 'discoveries were not of things but of patterns - mathematical symmetries that seemed to reflect, in some ultimately mysterious way, the manner in which subatomic particles behaved.'

Unlike most biographies, the opening does not start by describing the ancestry of the scientist, but rather tries to untangle the etymology of Gell-Mann's surname (in part, probably because he was consistently vague about it). Johnson notes that his older brother's surname was Gelman - the immediate assumption being that the egotistical Gell-Mann and adopted a grandiose surname, had it not been that his father's name was found in a phone book as also being Gell-Mann, which he adapted from Gellmann (yet another spelling). Johnson does uncover some ancestral details, but there is always the feeling that he is uncovering pieces of a puzzle that can seem as intricate and abstruse as the 'Eight-fold way' Gell-Mann devised for particle physics.

There are a number of ways of constructing a scientific biography that digs below the surface level of the physics as this does. A popular approach is to alternate chapters on the science and on the personal life. Johnson opts to integrate the two. I can see why this appeals contextually, but I think it makes it harder to get your head around what will always be a hard-to-grasp set of concepts. It's not just because the science is broken up, but also because we see the gradual development of the theory in snippets it can be hard to keep track from chapter to chapter as small steps forward and some reverses are dropped into the mix. It is entirely possible to pick up what you are being told, but it can be hard work to stay on top of it - I found I had to reread several sets of pages. However, Johnson's handling of Gell-Mann's professional and personal life is sufficiently engaging that there is always something to keep you going.

As I often have to say these days, it's too long at over 500 pages before getting to the notes and such. It has proved possible to write excellent scientific biographies of the likes of Newton, Einstein and Feynman at a far more practical length, so it's not a matter of coping with either a vast scientific output or a complicated personal life. It might seem odd as surely more words is more work to produce, but it feels lazy not to edit it to a more readable length. On the upside, though, for the output of an academic press, the book is very reasonably priced.

Overall, Johnson makes it clear that we have in Gell-Mann both an impressive contribution to physics and a life well worth exploring.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...