Skip to main content

Strange Beauty - George Johnson ****

This is a second edition of a scientific biography of the American physicist Murray Gell-Mann, first published in 1999. This edition adds in the remaining 20 years of Gell-Mann's life. Like most scientists, his contributions may not have been as outstanding in his later years, but it gives the complete picture - and he certainly continued to be interesting as a person.

George Johnson (who clearly like a touch of scientific beauty, having previously written The Ten Most Beautiful Experiments) does a good job of taking us into both the world and work of Gell-Mann. Not a household name, but one of the greats of twentieth century physics. Part of the problem, compared with the science that came before - even most of Einstein's - was that, as Johnson puts it, Gell-Mann's 'discoveries were not of things but of patterns - mathematical symmetries that seemed to reflect, in some ultimately mysterious way, the manner in which subatomic particles behaved.'

Unlike most biographies, the opening does not start by describing the ancestry of the scientist, but rather tries to untangle the etymology of Gell-Mann's surname (in part, probably because he was consistently vague about it). Johnson notes that his older brother's surname was Gelman - the immediate assumption being that the egotistical Gell-Mann and adopted a grandiose surname, had it not been that his father's name was found in a phone book as also being Gell-Mann, which he adapted from Gellmann (yet another spelling). Johnson does uncover some ancestral details, but there is always the feeling that he is uncovering pieces of a puzzle that can seem as intricate and abstruse as the 'Eight-fold way' Gell-Mann devised for particle physics.

There are a number of ways of constructing a scientific biography that digs below the surface level of the physics as this does. A popular approach is to alternate chapters on the science and on the personal life. Johnson opts to integrate the two. I can see why this appeals contextually, but I think it makes it harder to get your head around what will always be a hard-to-grasp set of concepts. It's not just because the science is broken up, but also because we see the gradual development of the theory in snippets it can be hard to keep track from chapter to chapter as small steps forward and some reverses are dropped into the mix. It is entirely possible to pick up what you are being told, but it can be hard work to stay on top of it - I found I had to reread several sets of pages. However, Johnson's handling of Gell-Mann's professional and personal life is sufficiently engaging that there is always something to keep you going.

As I often have to say these days, it's too long at over 500 pages before getting to the notes and such. It has proved possible to write excellent scientific biographies of the likes of Newton, Einstein and Feynman at a far more practical length, so it's not a matter of coping with either a vast scientific output or a complicated personal life. It might seem odd as surely more words is more work to produce, but it feels lazy not to edit it to a more readable length. On the upside, though, for the output of an academic press, the book is very reasonably priced.

Overall, Johnson makes it clear that we have in Gell-Mann both an impressive contribution to physics and a life well worth exploring.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows: Steven Pinker *****

In the past I've found Steven Pinker's books hypnotic - I drift along enjoying the words and feeling I'm getting something deep from it without anything much sinking in. This one was different - it was sometimes a little harder to get your head around the underlying concept, descending as it tends to into infinite regression, but overall I did feel I'd gained a lot.  Pinker's focus here is 'common knowledge' which is when not only do we both/all know something, but we know that the other(s) know as well and the implications this has for human interactions. One entertaining thing to emerge from this is the ability to get into infinite loops of the 'I know that you know that I know that...' variety. Although we aren't mentally equipped to deal with more than a handful of iterations, we are told that a simple but limited interaction like a text exchange strictly needs the full infinite set to be definitive. For example, if you and a friend are tryin...
Post a Comment
Read more