Skip to main content

Extraction to Extinction - David Howe ****

In this book, David Howe manages the near-impossible - making geology interesting. Usually, this is one of those dull, earnest sciences that it's hard to get too excited about. It might be a slight exaggeration, but for many of us, when you've seen one rock, you've seen them all. But Howe overcomes this issue with a combination of engaging storytelling and combining information about geology with how we humans have made use of them and the materials made from them - the book absolutely comes alive whenever we move from how the rocks were formed to how they have been used (and abused).

That storytelling element captured me from the first sentence: Howe had me at 'I was standing on Alderley Edge when I first wondered about it.' I admit that this is partly a matter of personal identification with the story. I too went to school in Manchester and explored Alderley Edge as a teen - I was a fan of Alan Garner, and even (not entirely licitly) ventured down the copper mines that Howe describes.

As far as the applications side goes, we tend to take for granted the availability of the raw materials extracted from the Earth that go to make up familiar objects, but as Howe takes us through the origin stories of brick and ceramics, copper, iron and steel, concrete, glass, aluminium, plastics and lithium and the rare earth elements, he both makes these everyday objects appear far more special and puts them into their context in the bigger picture of nature.

We then get the least satisfactory part of the book, where Howe takes us through the downside of our overuse of the Earth's resources and of the pollution and greenhouse gas production that results. It's not that these are unimportant issues, but they need a book in their own right to be as nuanced as the rest of the contents - having a couple of chapters on the subject just takes away from the rest of the book without being able to explore the issues properly. (There is, for example, no real mention of the need to balance out inconsistent sources like wind and sun, particularly somewhere like the UK, with storage and, almost certainly, nuclear.)

Things pick up again with the final chapter on the debated topic of whether we are now in the 'Anthropocene' epoch, where the reader is presented with the beguiling concept of future geologists finding layers in the Earth that correspond to what humans are doing at the moment. The only opportunity potentially missed here was to open up the debate as to whether this is a true epoch or a geological event.

Every now and then, usually when trying to be humorous, Howe's writing style becomes rather old fashioned - for example 'There appears to be a population of bevvy-swilling bozos who, wishing to show their strength by crushing flat their drained cans and then tossing them out of their car windows lend support to the Yorkshire proverb "Strong int'arm and thick in't head"' - but mostly I found this an enjoyable and thought-provoking read.

Paperback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more